[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: Struct#select behavior vs rdoc

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-01-31 05:50:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #7256
Hi,

On 1/31/06, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
> % ri Struct#select
> ---------------------------------------------------------- Struct#select
>       struct.select(fixnum, ... )   => array
>       struct.select {|i| block }    => array
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> irb(main):001:0> st = Struct.new 'Foo', :a, :b
> => Struct::Foo
> irb(main):002:0> s = st.new 'a', 'b'
> => #<struct Struct::Foo a="a", b="b">
> irb(main):003:0> s.select 0
> ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (1 for 0)

> I assume this is intentional, may I update the rdoc to reflect this
> change?

Yes.

							matz.


In This Thread

Prev Next