[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: Some troubles with an embedded ruby interpreter

From: Matt Mower <matt.mower@...>
Date: 2006-01-26 00:31:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #7212
Hrmm...

On 25/01/06, Matt Mower <matt.mower@gmail.com> wrote:
> However I am having some problems when it comes to executing ruby
> scripts using rb_load_file with a script included in the App bundle. I
> don't think bundling is the issue since a bundle is just a directory
> as far as the underlying OS (and Ruby) are concerned.
>

Seems like rb_load_file is some kind of giant white elephant since:

    rb_eval_string( [[[@"require \""
stringByAppendingString:scriptPath] stringByAppendingString:@"\""]
fileSystemRepresentation] );

Works fine.

I've been digging through the interpreter sources but it's been 15
years since I did any hardcore C so I haven't figured out why
rb_load_file wouldn't do what I expected.

Regards,

Matt

--
Matt Mower :: http://matt.blogs.it/


In This Thread