[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3317 ] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess

From: nobu@...
Date: 2006-01-25 13:27:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #7204
Hi,

At Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:45:35 +0900,
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote in [ruby-core:07195]:
> if a program now includes unistd and ruby.h you get the following error:
> /usr/include/unistd.h:266: error: declaration of 'int eaccess(const char*, int) throw ()' throws different exceptions

Why `throw' in C?

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread