[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2006-01-06 11:36:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #7065
In article <86zmmaf96p.fsf@bitty.lumos.us>,
  Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> writes:

> Hopefully, this or something like it can find its way in.  In the
> meantime, please test this if you have access to Solaris!

It works for me too on Solaris 8 on SPARC with gcc 4.1.0
20060102 (prerelease).

I think it is acceptable that ruby 1.8 incorporate the
patch.  (ruby 1.9 has different fix already.)

However, I guess Solaris on AMD64 needs something different
than defined(__sparc).
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread

Prev Next