[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Fast Ruby Debugger?

From: Joseph Moore <joe.moore@...>
Date: 2006-01-09 06:49:41 UTC
List: ruby-core #7077
After developing in Java for years in IDEs I'm starving for a decent ruby
debugger.  When learning new codebasesI find it invaluable to use the
debugger to step through the system and see how things work at runtime.
Using RDT in Eclipse is fine but it's excruciating to wait minutes for the
default debugger to finally reach my breakpoints on tests that normally take
seconds to run.

Does anyone have for either speeding up the debugger or dropping in a faster
version?

I've tried to profile debug.rb by adding "require 'profile'" to it but all
of the time shows up in the "#toplevel" element, so advice on deconstructing
that into something meaningful would be great, too.

Thanks,

-- Joe

In This Thread

Prev Next