[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Still $SAFE

From: Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Date: 2006-01-20 20:11:16 UTC
List: ruby-core #7177
Hi,

as many of you probably noticed, I didn't get an answer to
my question on Ruby-Talk:

  <http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/176135>

Just let me ask it in a simpler way:


irb(main):001:0> instance_eval { $SAFE = 4 } ; $SAFE
=> 4
irb(main):002:0> instance_eval " $SAFE = 4 " ; $SAFE
=> 0


What is the fundamental difference? And why?

In `eval.c', I find a macro `PUSH_FRAME'. What are all the
ways I can induce Ruby to enter a subframe?

Thanks in advance.

Bertram


-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de

In This Thread

Prev Next