[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

RUBYOPT versioning?

From: Caleb Tennis <caleb@...>
Date: 2006-01-02 22:00:46 UTC
List: ruby-core #7043
Matz, others:

Is there any chance we could get a RUBYOPT variable that's specific  
to the Ruby version?  IE:

RUBYOPT18="-rubygems"
RUBYOPT19=""

Ruby 1.8 only listens to RUBYOPT18 (and RUBYOPT like normal).  Ruby  
1.9 only listens to RUBYOPT19 (and RUBYOPT).  This way, if you run  
both versions on the system you can customize which RUBYOPTs go to  
which version you are using.

Thanks,
Caleb

In This Thread

Prev Next