[#7043] RUBYOPT versioning? — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...>
Matz, others:
[#7050] RDoc patches for BigDecimal in Ruby CVS — mathew <meta@...>
Now that 1.8.4 is out and the initial flurry of problem reports has died
[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in
Hi,
On 05/01/06, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
On 06/01/06, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 09/01/06, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
[#7057] 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited — Steven Lumos <steven@...>
[#7078] CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler — Anders Hkersten <chucky@...>
Hello everyone,
[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)
Hi,
Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Daniel Berger wrote:
*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, mathew wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, James Britt wrote:
Dean Wampler <deanwampler gmail.com> writes:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, mathew wrote:
[#7100] core dump with ruby 1.9.0 (2006-01-10) and bdb-0.5.8 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
I found following test script dumps core.
>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:
In article <200601110905.k0B950Op001713@moulon.inra.fr>,
[#7109] Calling flock with block? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
[#7129] YAML.load({[]=>""}.to_yaml) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
I found that current YAML doesn't round trip {[]=>""}.
Hi.
Hi.
In article <20060115202203.D3624CA0.ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp>,
[#7162] FileUtils.mv does not unlink source file when moving over filesystem boundary — Pav Lucistnik <pav@...>
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
[#7178] Add XHTML 1.0 Output Support to Ruby CGI — Paul Duncan <pabs@...>
The attached patch against Ruby 1.8.4 adds XHTML 1.0 output support to
[#7186] Ruby 1.9 and FHS — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
Build and install system changes:
[#7195] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess — noreply@...
Bugs item #3317, was opened at 2006-01-24 15:33
[#7197] SSL-enabled DRb fds on SSLError? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews)
Howdy,
On Jan 24, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Clifford T. Matthews wrote:
Patch worked fine against HEAD.
[#7203] bcc32's memory manager bug — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hi.
[#7211] Some troubles with an embedded ruby interpreter — Matt Mower <matt.mower@...>
Hi folks,
[#7216] String#scan loops forefever if scanned string is modified inside block. — noreply@...
Bugs item #3329, was opened at 2006-01-26 10:55
[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Hello,
Sean E. Russell wrote:
>
On 1/28/06, Caleb Tennis <caleb@aei-tech.com> wrote:
On Saturday 28 January 2006 17:13, Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
Sean E. Russell wrote:
[#7249] PATCH: append option to sysread — Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@...>
[#7259] TCP/UDP server weird lags on 1.8.4 linux — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...>
Hi !
[ ruby-Bugs-3317 ] trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess
Bugs item #3317, was opened at 2006-01-24 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=3317&group_id=426
Category: Core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Marcus Rueckert (darix)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: trouble due ruby redefining posix function eaccess
Initial Comment:
ruby redefines eaccess in intern.h
[[[
$ grep eaccess intern.h
int eaccess _((const char*, int));
]]]
that wasnt a problem as long the ruby definition matched the glibc definition.
for the upcoming glibc 2.4 the definition of eaccess() was changed a bit.
the relevant snippet from the unistd.h [1]
[[[
/* Test for access to NAME using the effective UID and GID
(as normal file operations use). */
extern int euidaccess (__const char *__name, int __type)
__THROW __nonnull ((1));
/* An alias for `euidaccess', used by some other systems. */
extern int eaccess (__const char *__name, int __type)
__THROW __nonnull ((1));
]]]
[1]
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/posix/unistd.h?rev=1.143&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=glibc
if a program now includes unistd and ruby.h you get the following error:
/usr/include/unistd.h:266: error: declaration of 'int eaccess(const char*, int) throw ()' throws different exceptions
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i586-linux/intern.h:223: error: from previous declaration 'int eaccess(const char*, int)'
from the code it seems the ruby version is not as strict as the glibc version.
would it be enough to rename the ruby internal function to rb_eaccess and refactor all calls from eaccess to rb_eaccess?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=3317&group_id=426