[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.9 and FHS

From: Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Date: 2006-01-23 15:01:07 UTC
List: ruby-core #7190
On 1/23/06, Kirill A. Shutemov <k.shutemov@sam-solutions.net> wrote:

> I don't think that scrap-heap of header, rb and binary files is very
> cleanliness.

I agree.  I keep going into /usr/include to look for the Ruby headers.
 I really don't see why we need to bunch everything in
$(prefix)/lib/ruby/X.Y other than that we make it easy for ourselves
with the X.Y versioning.  That would have to be dealt for each
directory we install into if it was ever separated.

  nikolai


In This Thread