[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: CRC - a proof-of-concept Ruby compiler

From: Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>
Date: 2006-01-09 17:16:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #7079
Anders H旦ckersten wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> During the last few months me and Andreas Farre have been doing our
> master's thesis on a proof-of-concept compiler for Ruby. The idea is to
> test how well a language like Ruby can be compiled to C--[1]. We are
> nearing the end of our thesis and will be focusing most of our remaining
> time towards writing our report. We would however like feedback on our
> work from the Ruby community.

Hello,

Some people are interested in doing the same thing for Neko 
(http://nekovm.org). How you would compare the work needed to target 
Neko against targeting directly x86 bytecode ? What where the difficult 
point is writing the compiler ? Is there some Ruby Language Reference 
available somewhere on what you work is based ?

Best,

Nicolas

In This Thread