[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: More on VC++ 2005

From: nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...>
Date: 2006-01-10 01:03:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #7085
Hi,

At Sat, 7 Jan 2006 03:48:02 +0900,
Austin Ziegler wrote in [ruby-core:07069]:
> The patches look good on 1.8.4.

Thank you.

> It would be *nice* to be able to have the manifest stuff automatically
> applied to the .so files as well, just in case, but since they depend
> on Ruby or the msvcr80-ruby18.dll (which *does* have the manifest
> applied), that should be good enough. It's probably worth documenting
> somewhere, though.

Documentation for what, to whom, and how?

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread