[#686] Wall compilation — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi everybody,
[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:38:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#708] Documentation for thread.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi ruby-core,
[#719] nd_end and NODE_NEWLINE (fwd) — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>
I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or
Hi,
On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi --
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:
Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:
Hi,
matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 03:34:46 +0900
[#730] Comments on matrix.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi -core,
[#757] Extensions for Time and ParseDate — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Eric and I have been hacking around and we can't stand the lack of
[#759] Adding Test::Unit to CVS — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Matz has already given me the go-ahead to add Test::Unit to CVS, but I
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:56 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:
Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted
Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
> I think it's ok to use "binding" this way. Let's look at another
> word that has similar usage. The word "association" can be used in
> both the collective and individual sense:
>
> The association between the variable 'x' and its value 2.
>
> The association between the currently defined variables and their
> values.
You can use association this way, but not binding. E.g. this is more
correct:
The binding between the variable 'x' and its value 2. (not a
sentence, but...)
The bindings between the variables and their values.
Still I agree with Matz that "Environment" or similar would be a bad
name for the current Binding class. I was just explaining why this
seemed wrong:
Binding#bind(name, value)