[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2003/01/15
[#722] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/20

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:

[#740] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/21

Hi,

[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or

23 messages 2003/01/20
[#728] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/20

Hi,

[#743] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — "Pit Capitain" <pit@...> 2003/01/21

On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#767] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/22

[#768] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — dblack@... 2003/01/22

Hi --

[#779] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/01/23

On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:

Re: Documentation for thread.rb

From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2003-01-17 02:56:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #710
On Friday, January 17, 2003, 12:45:30 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

> |  I include page references, because they are currently in ri.

> This should eventually removed.

OK, I'll leave them in for now, for consistency, and to avoid wasting
too much time thinking about it.


> |  I don't include class examples from the Pickaxe, but should I?

> Perhaps.

I'll try, and see how it comes out in HTML.


> |Note especially that Queue and SizedQueue are not documented in
> |Pickaxe (online version).  At least I can't find them.  I've therefore
> |made a comment in the code asking if "Ruby in a Nutshell" should be
> |used as a source instead.

> Please.  You can use the Nutshell

Thanks.  I'll do that before committing.


> |[1] I'm inexperienced in creating patches - I just used cvs diff -u.
> |I don't expect this to be treated as a patch just yet anyway.

> This is excellent.  And you can commit them.  Now you are the
> committer, aren't you?

I am.  So, just to confirm: the committed code may have things like
"FIXME" etc.  I think that's OK, but someone needs to make sure these
are resolved or removed before the next release.  I am happy to be
given the task of reviewing all RDoc in CVS when the time comes.

Should I post here again before committing this file?  What about
other files?

Gavin


In This Thread