[#686] Wall compilation — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi everybody,
[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:38:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#708] Documentation for thread.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi ruby-core,
[#719] nd_end and NODE_NEWLINE (fwd) — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>
I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or
Hi,
On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi --
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:
Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:
Hi,
matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 03:34:46 +0900
[#730] Comments on matrix.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi -core,
[#757] Extensions for Time and ParseDate — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Eric and I have been hacking around and we can't stand the lack of
[#759] Adding Test::Unit to CVS — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Matz has already given me the go-ahead to add Test::Unit to CVS, but I
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:56 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:
Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote: > Binding#bind doesn't sound right to me. I would say either: > - bind a symbol to a value, or > - add a symbol to a binding > but not "bind a symbol to a binding." At least, that's what my > language sense tells me. > Binding#add, maybe? Bind#bind(sym,val) as in "bind a symbol to a value, in the context of a binding". (however i'd rather say: bind a value to a symbol ... but i'm all backwards) I'm proposing Binding#[]= in my RCR (#29), which I think is the most convenient, because the principal aggregate held by a binding is its localvariable-table. I think of #[] and #[]= as meaning "access the principal aggregate held by an object", with "principal" as in "most important" or "natural". ________________________________________________________________ Mathieu Bouchard http://artengine.ca/matju