[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2003/01/15
[#722] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/20

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:

[#740] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/21

Hi,

[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or

23 messages 2003/01/20
[#728] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/20

Hi,

[#743] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — "Pit Capitain" <pit@...> 2003/01/21

On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#767] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/22

[#768] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — dblack@... 2003/01/22

Hi --

[#779] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/01/23

On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:

Re: Adding Test::Unit to CVS

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-01-22 20:54:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #772
Hi,

In message "Re: Adding Test::Unit to CVS"
    on 03/01/23, Dave Thomas <dave@pragmaticprogrammer.com> writes:

|>  Also, while I guess Rubicon may be
|> part of the distribution someday, it isn't today, which means there
|> isn't a good place for the Test::Unit tests to go (yet).
|
|Is there a reason that rubicon couldn't be included? It seems pretty 
|stable (Nathaniel's recent patch notwithstanding).

The only reason I can think of is absence of Test::Unit in the
distribution.  So it's kinda like chikens and eggs.

							matz.

In This Thread