[#686] Wall compilation — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi everybody,
[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:38:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#708] Documentation for thread.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi ruby-core,
[#719] nd_end and NODE_NEWLINE (fwd) — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>
I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or
Hi,
On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi --
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:
Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:
Hi,
matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 03:34:46 +0900
[#730] Comments on matrix.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi -core,
[#757] Extensions for Time and ParseDate — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Eric and I have been hacking around and we can't stand the lack of
[#759] Adding Test::Unit to CVS — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Matz has already given me the go-ahead to add Test::Unit to CVS, but I
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:56 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:
Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote: > I think it could be handy to make possible adding files to 'clean' and > 'distclean' sections of Makefile. > What do you think? I've written an extension but it is different enough from regular mkmf-using extensions that after the makefile is written, I reread the makefile, perform a dozen of sub!/gsub!'s on it, and rewrite it. I've been tempted to do away with mkmf, but I'm keeping it so that I don't have to deal with some crossplatform compatibility issues. The most annoying parts of mkmf are: 1. no C++ support (I stopped using C). I have to change gcc for g++; The former works fine only on certain platforms with certain versions of the compiler. For the rest, "g++" has to be used. 2. no support for other languages/situations (I generate assembly language code from a ruby script). If mkmf is not going to support that (which is fine with me), then it could at least provide a means to plug my own makefile additions in. This includes hooks into rules all/clean/distclean/etc. 3. no support for multiple directories of source files (I have three). 4. I don't know what's supposed to be the difference between site-install and install, but the directory that "install" installs into is not the one my extension was installing into before mkmf came here. 5. Where is documentation supposed to be installed? (this is not a mkmf-specific issue) ________________________________________________________________ Mathieu Bouchard http://artengine.ca/matju