[#2139] Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

69 messages 2004/01/04
[#2140] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/04

On Monday, January 5, 2004, 2:29:57 AM, Dave wrote:

[#2141] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/04

Hi,

[#2145] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/01/05

Perhaps make it available for mirrors and save ruby-lang's bandwidth?

[#2147] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

[#2148] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

So, I'm thinking about doing the following? Is this OK with everyone?

[#2149] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/01/05

[#2152] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

[#2153] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/05

Hi,

[#2154] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

[#2219] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2004/01/12

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:41 +0900

[#2194] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

27 messages 2004/01/09
[#2195] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/01/09

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Ian Macdonald wrote:

[#2199] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/09

On Fri 09 Jan 2004 at 23:10:02 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#2200] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/10

Hi,

[#2203] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/11

On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2206] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/11

Hi,

[#2208] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/11

On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 21:40:22 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2209] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/12

Hi,

[#2216] ruby aborts in data-handling applications — xsdg <xsdg@...>

I reported a similar bug about 2 or 3 months ago. The problem seemed to go

12 messages 2004/01/12

Re: A suggestion for libraries such as base64.rb

From: "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>
Date: 2004-01-20 15:58:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #2286
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Thomas [mailto:dave@pragprog.com] 
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 10:43 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: A suggestion for libraries such as base64.rb
> 
> 
> Some of the older libraries simply insert stuff into the top-level 
> namespace. For example, base64.rb adds four methods to the top-level.
> 
> As a transition away from this, how about changing these modules 
> slightly. For example, base64 would become:
> 
>      module Base64
>        def b64encode...
>          etc
> 
>        module_function :b64encode, ...
>     end
>     include Base64
> 
> This doesn't break any existing code, but when we document the module 
> we can strongly recommend that folks use the encapsulated 
> forms instead 
> of the global methods. Then, at some later date, we can remove the 
> include statement at stop the methods being inserted at the top level.
> 
> The reason I ask is that I just finished RDoc'ing base64... :)
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Dave

Apparently this RCR dropped by the wayside. :(

http://rcrchive.net/rcr/RCR/RCR160

Dan


In This Thread

Prev Next