[#2139] Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Folks:
On Monday, January 5, 2004, 2:29:57 AM, Dave wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps make it available for mirrors and save ruby-lang's bandwidth?
Hi,
So, I'm thinking about doing the following? Is this OK with everyone?
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:41 +0900
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:30:52 +0900
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:01:38AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi, Dave,
Hi,
Hi, daz,
On Tuesday, 6 January 2004 at 15:02:50 +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2163] Occasional --enable-pthread hangs... — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
First of all, thanks so much to all those that have helped with
On Jan 5, 2004, at 21:49, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#2186] Absolute paths in shebang lines? — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>
What would the reaction be to reconsidering the following proposal?
[#2194] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Ian Macdonald wrote:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 at 23:10:02 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 21:40:22 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 10:31:52 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 22:36:16 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 10:31:52 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2211] xxx_init_copy — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I notivce that there're a bunch of new xxx_init_copy methods: RDoc is
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#2216] ruby aborts in data-handling applications — xsdg <xsdg@...>
I reported a similar bug about 2 or 3 months ago. The problem seemed to go
Hi,
I've finally found a combination that will reliably segfault. Since my first post on this topic, I've switched the backend from BDB to GDBM.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:32:59AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2225] Fwd: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * file.c (test_wr, test_ww): New functions implementing new — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 23:38:29 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2251] YAML_Unit_Tests failed — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
Hi,
[#2285] A suggestion for libraries such as base64.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Some of the older libraries simply insert stuff into the top-level
[#2305] Time#usec round trip problem — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi,
[#2306] YAML.dump("a".."z") — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi,
A suggestion for libraries such as base64.rb
Some of the older libraries simply insert stuff into the top-level
namespace. For example, base64.rb adds four methods to the top-level.
As a transition away from this, how about changing these modules
slightly. For example, base64 would become:
module Base64
def b64encode...
etc
module_function :b64encode, ...
end
include Base64
This doesn't break any existing code, but when we document the module
we can strongly recommend that folks use the encapsulated forms instead
of the global methods. Then, at some later date, we can remove the
include statement at stop the methods being inserted at the top level.
The reason I ask is that I just finished RDoc'ing base64... :)
Cheers
Dave