[#2139] Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

69 messages 2004/01/04
[#2140] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/04

On Monday, January 5, 2004, 2:29:57 AM, Dave wrote:

[#2141] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/04

Hi,

[#2145] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/01/05

Perhaps make it available for mirrors and save ruby-lang's bandwidth?

[#2147] Re: Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

[#2148] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

So, I'm thinking about doing the following? Is this OK with everyone?

[#2149] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/01/05

[#2152] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

[#2153] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/05

Hi,

[#2154] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/05

[#2219] Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2004/01/12

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:41 +0900

[#2194] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

27 messages 2004/01/09
[#2195] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/01/09

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Ian Macdonald wrote:

[#2199] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/09

On Fri 09 Jan 2004 at 23:10:02 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#2200] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/10

Hi,

[#2203] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/11

On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2206] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/11

Hi,

[#2208] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/11

On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 21:40:22 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2209] Re: [PATCH] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/12

Hi,

[#2216] ruby aborts in data-handling applications — xsdg <xsdg@...>

I reported a similar bug about 2 or 3 months ago. The problem seemed to go

12 messages 2004/01/12

Absolute paths in shebang lines?

From: "J.Herre" <jlst@...>
Date: 2004-01-07 19:04:17 UTC
List: ruby-core #2186
What would the reaction be to reconsidering the following proposal?  
The responses at the time seemed inconclusive.

The current situation makes running multiple versions of ruby a little 
confusing.  In particular I'm worried about rdoc and ri not doing what 
one would expect.

-J

[ruby-dev:19370] shebang line of bin/*

   U. Nakamura proposed that an absolute path to installed ruby should 
be used
   at a shebang line. Currently, the word `ruby' written at a shebang 
line of
   each file in `bin' directory is replaced with ruby_install_name at 
installation
   stage. In this proposal, the shebang line will be replaced with an 
absolute
   path to installed ruby.

     Current --
       #!/usr/bin/env ruby   --> #!/usr/bin/env ruby-1.6
     Proposal --
       #!/usr/bin/env ruby   --> #!/usr/local/bin/ruby-1.6


In This Thread

Prev Next