[#2139] Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Folks:
On Monday, January 5, 2004, 2:29:57 AM, Dave wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps make it available for mirrors and save ruby-lang's bandwidth?
Hi,
So, I'm thinking about doing the following? Is this OK with everyone?
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:41 +0900
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:30:52 +0900
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:01:38AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi, Dave,
Hi,
Hi, daz,
On Tuesday, 6 January 2004 at 15:02:50 +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2163] Occasional --enable-pthread hangs... — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
First of all, thanks so much to all those that have helped with
On Jan 5, 2004, at 21:49, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#2186] Absolute paths in shebang lines? — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>
What would the reaction be to reconsidering the following proposal?
[#2194] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Ian Macdonald wrote:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 at 23:10:02 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 21:40:22 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 10:31:52 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 22:36:16 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 10:31:52 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2211] xxx_init_copy — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I notivce that there're a bunch of new xxx_init_copy methods: RDoc is
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#2216] ruby aborts in data-handling applications — xsdg <xsdg@...>
I reported a similar bug about 2 or 3 months ago. The problem seemed to go
Hi,
I've finally found a combination that will reliably segfault. Since my first post on this topic, I've switched the backend from BDB to GDBM.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:32:59AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2225] Fwd: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * file.c (test_wr, test_ww): New functions implementing new — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 23:38:29 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2251] YAML_Unit_Tests failed — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
Hi,
[#2285] A suggestion for libraries such as base64.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Some of the older libraries simply insert stuff into the top-level
[#2305] Time#usec round trip problem — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi,
[#2306] YAML.dump("a".."z") — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi,
(forw) (forw) rdoc/ri - makefile
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:44:46 -0500 From: skaar <skaar@aol.net> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Subject: (forw) rdoc/ri - makefile Message-ID: <20040113034446.GJ1063@aol.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > To by untrained eye this looks reasonable, but I really don't know the > details of the Ruby build process across all the platforms. Could you > post this to the -core list and ask for comments there... > > Cheers > > Dave I was asked to forward this mod to the install-doc section of the makefile. -- /skaar +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----- skaar@aol.net kent skaar ----------------+ +----- internet services: infrastructure security ----------------+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:10:36 -0500 From: skaar <skaar@aol.net> To: Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> Subject: rdoc/ri - makefile Message-ID: <20040113021036.GI1063@aol.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline maybe you want to do this differently, but this is a patch for the makefile, for installs that doesn't install directly into the destination directory (such as OpenBSD fake and Gentoo's portage). This will make sure that it doesn't use an alrealy installed ruby. -- /skaar +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----- skaar@aol.net kent skaar ----------------+ +----- internet services: infrastructure security ----------------+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rdoc_makefile.out" --- Makefile.orig 2004-01-12 20:59:19.892511616 -0500 +++ Makefile 2004-01-12 21:04:14.795679520 -0500 @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ install-doc: @echo Generating RDoc documentation - $(bindir)/$(PROGRAM) $(srcdir)/bin/rdoc --all --ri-system $(srcdir) + $(MINIRUBY) -Ilib -Iext/syck $(srcdir)/bin/rdoc --all --ri-system $(srcdir) clean-ext: @-$(MINIRUBY) $(srcdir)/ext/extmk.rb $(SCRIPT_ARGS) clean 2> /dev/null || true --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM-- --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg--