[#1207] warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...>
This message was posted to ruby-talk, but I didn't get responce from
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
Hi,
[#1229] stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:59:53PM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:26:43AM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Hi,
[#1237] FTP.new with block — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi,
>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:06:13AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:51:03PM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:59:19PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#1249] File.write(path, data)? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
I am glad to see File.read(path) in Ruby 1.8. But what about
[#1256] testunit, exit status and at_exit — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'd really like TestUnit to be able to return an exit status when I run
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sean E. Russell [mailto:ser@germane-software.com] wrote:
Hi,
[#1257] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hello,
[#1297] Fix for Bug 1058 — Markus Walser <walser@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Friday 25 July 2003 10:58, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:46, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
I tried to figure out what's wrong. So far I havn't a solution:
Hello,
> Check the value of klass by
Hi,
[#1309] exceptions and such — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#1310] adding NodeDump and ii — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
Re: stack problem
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> In message "Re: stack problem"
> on 03/07/16, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@sympatico.ca> writes:
> |Interesting. This would work for me; however it would still be convenient
> |to not have to rely on modifying every access point.
> It would be. But I have no idea yet to accomplish.
This is my current cleaned-up code for finding the bottom of the stack.
Does this make sense to you? Can you find any problems with it?
static volatile long bogus = 0; // to force *bp to be read in memory
static sigjmp_buf rescue_segfault;
static void trap_segfault (int patate) { siglongjmp(rescue_segfault,11); }
extern "C" void Init_stack(VALUE *addr);
static VALUE *localize_sysstack () {
// get any stack address
volatile long * volatile bp = (volatile long *)&bp;
sighandler_t old = signal(11,trap_segfault);
// read stack until segfault; segfault is redefined as a break.
if (!sigsetjmp(rescue_segfault,0))
for (;;bp-=STACK_GROW_DIRECTION) bogus += *bp;
// restore signal handler
signal(11,old);
return (VALUE *)(bp+STACK_GROW_DIRECTION);
}
________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard http://artengine.ca/matju