[#1207] warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...>
This message was posted to ruby-talk, but I didn't get responce from
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:
Hi,
[#1229] stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:59:53PM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:26:43AM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Hi,
[#1237] FTP.new with block — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi,
>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:
Hi,
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:06:13AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:51:03PM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:59:19PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#1249] File.write(path, data)? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
I am glad to see File.read(path) in Ruby 1.8. But what about
[#1256] testunit, exit status and at_exit — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'd really like TestUnit to be able to return an exit status when I run
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sean E. Russell [mailto:ser@germane-software.com] wrote:
Hi,
[#1257] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hello,
[#1297] Fix for Bug 1058 — Markus Walser <walser@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Friday 25 July 2003 10:58, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:46, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
I tried to figure out what's wrong. So far I havn't a solution:
Hello,
> Check the value of klass by
Hi,
[#1309] exceptions and such — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#1310] adding NodeDump and ii — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit
Sean E. Russell [mailto:ser@germane-software.com] wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 00:08, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > I'd really like TestUnit to be able to return an exit status when I
> > run a test using
>
> Ditto, and I'll even provide a use case.
>
> If you have a software package that you make regular releases of, and a
> semi-automated distribution mechanism, having an exit status on the unit
> tests would allow the distribution mechanism to fail if any unit tests
> failed. This would help avoid distributing broken releases, by making
> testing on staging machines easier.
I agree, too, but as Dave pointed out, my hands are tied at this point. I
think Test::Unit has used (and abused) exit blocks a lot more than was
perhaps ever intended (which, BTW, is Dave's fault in the first place - he
gave me the idea :-). It does seem useful, though, to be able to set the
exit status from an exit block.
For your case, Sean, there is a work around:
if($0 == __FILE__)
exit(1) unless(Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(suite).passed?)
end
Unfortunately, in the current version under 1.8, it requires you to build
the suite yourself. Under the version in /rough/lib/testunit, you could just
do the following:
exit(1) unless(Test::Unit::AutoRunner::run(__FILE__))
I may get it merged before the 1.8 release; if not, expect it for sure in
1.8.1.
Nathaniel
<:((><