ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#1207] warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...>

This message was posted to ruby-talk, but I didn't get responce from

22 messages 2003/07/01

[#1208] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/01

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:

[#1209] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/07/02

ts wrote:

[#1210] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/02

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:

[#1211] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/07/04

ts wrote:

[#1212] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:

[#1213] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/07/04

ts wrote:

[#1214] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:

[#1215] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/07/04

ts wrote:

[#1216] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:

[#1218] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/07/04

ts wrote:

[#1220] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@itgrp.net> writes:

[#1221] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/04

Hi,

[#1222] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1224] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/04

Hi,

[#1226] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1227] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/04

Hi,

[#1217] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/04

Hi,

[#1219] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/04

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1223] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/04

Hi,

[#1225] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/04

Hi,

[#1228] Re: warning in ruby extension eats memory — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/07/07

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1229] stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

15 messages 2003/07/12

[#1230] Re: stack problem — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/07/12

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:59:53PM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#1231] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/13

[#1233] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/14

[#1234] Re: stack problem — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/07/14

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:26:43AM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#1235] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/15

[#1236] Re: stack problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/15

Hi,

[#1278] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/22

[#1279] Re: stack problem — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/23

Hi,

[#1280] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/23

[#1281] Re: stack problem — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/23

Hi,

[#1282] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/23

[#1283] Re: stack problem — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/23

Hi,

[#1292] Re: stack problem — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/23

[#1293] Re: stack problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/23

Hi,

[#1232] Re: Timezones in ChangeLog — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

1 message 2003/07/14

[#1237] FTP.new with block — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Hi,

22 messages 2003/07/19

[#1238] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/19

>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:

[#1240] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/19

[#1242] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/19

Hi,

[#1243] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/07/19

On Sunday, July 20, 2003, 3:03:49 AM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#1245] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/07/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1246] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/07/19

On Sunday, July 20, 2003, 4:11:32 AM, Dave wrote:

[#1247] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/07/19

[#1248] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/07/19

> On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#1241] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/07/19

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:57:59AM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#1244] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/07/19

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#1250] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org> 2003/07/20

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:06:13AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#1251] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/20

>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:

[#1261] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org> 2003/07/21

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:51:03PM +0900, ts wrote:

[#1262] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/21

>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:

[#1276] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org> 2003/07/22

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:59:19PM +0900, ts wrote:

[#1277] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/22

>>>>> "R" == Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> writes:

[#1294] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org> 2003/07/24

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:16:09PM +0900, ts wrote:

[#1284] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/23

Hi,

[#1295] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org> 2003/07/24

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:47:34AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1296] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/24

Hi,

[#1239] Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/19

Hi,

[#1249] File.write(path, data)? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

I am glad to see File.read(path) in Ruby 1.8. But what about

5 messages 2003/07/20

[#1252] Re: File.write(path, data)? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/20

Hi,

[#1254] Re: File.write(path, data)? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/07/20

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 02:17:19 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1255] Re: File.write(path, data)? — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2003/07/21

> [matz:]

[#1253] Re: File.write(path, data)? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/07/20

> -----Original Message-----

[#1256] testunit, exit status and at_exit — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'd really like TestUnit to be able to return an exit status when I run

9 messages 2003/07/21

[#1260] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2003/07/21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#1263] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/07/21

Sean E. Russell [mailto:ser@germane-software.com] wrote:

[#1266] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/21

Hi,

[#1267] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/07/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

[#1268] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2003/07/21

[#1269] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/22

Hi,

[#1270] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/07/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

[#1273] Re: testunit, exit status and at_exit — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/22

Hi,

[#1257] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hello,

7 messages 2003/07/21

[#1258] Re: [RFC] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/21

Hi,

[#1259] Re: [RFC] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2003/07/21

Hello,

[#1264] Re: [RFC] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/21

Hi,

[#1265] Re: [RFC] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/21

Hi,

[#1274] Re: [RFC] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2003/07/22

Hello,

[#1271] Re: [RFC] Add have_defined() and rework have_struct_member() — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/07/22

In article <20030721081252.GC18371@nightmare.sh.cvut.cz>,

[#1272] status of openssl 0.2 support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>

Greetings!

2 messages 2003/07/22

[#1275] Re: status of openssl 0.2 support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2003/07/22

Hello,

[#1285] IRB in latest CVS doesn't run — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

dave[ruby/ruby 8:52:53] irb

3 messages 2003/07/23

[#1286] Re: IRB in latest CVS doesn't run — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/23

[#1289] Re: IRB in latest CVS doesn't run — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/07/23

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1287] rb_define_const() — Geoff Youngs <g@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2003/07/23

[#1288] Re: rb_define_const() — Geoff Youngs <g@...> 2003/07/23

On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:04:00AM +0900, Geoff Youngs wrote:

[#1290] Malloc problem — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

OK, I've got an ugly one:

2 messages 2003/07/23

[#1291] Re: Malloc problem — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2003/07/23

this is on Mac OS X, yes? Try the tool

[#1297] Fix for Bug 1058 — Markus Walser <walser@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2003/07/25

[#1298] Re: Fix for Bug 1058 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/25

Hi,

[#1299] Re: Fix for Bug 1058 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/25

On Friday 25 July 2003 10:58, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1300] Re: Fix for Bug 1058 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/25

Hi,

[#1301] Re: Fix for Bug 1058 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/25

On Friday 25 July 2003 11:46, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1302] Bug 1060 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/25

I tried to figure out what's wrong. So far I havn't a solution:

[#1303] Re: Bug 1060 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/25

Hello,

[#1304] Re: Bug 1060 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/25

> Check the value of klass by

[#1305] Re: Bug 1060 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/25

Hi,

[#1306] Re: Bug 1060 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/25

when I take out -O2 from the top Makefile, the segfault disapears...

[#1307] Re: Bug 1060 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/25

-O1 also segfaults. I will do the checks next week again with the original

[#1308] Re: Bug 1060 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/26

Hi,

[#1318] Re: Bug 1060 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/28

On Friday 25 July 2003 20:01, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1319] Re: Bug 1060 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/28

Hi,

[#1320] Re: Bug 1060 — Markus Walser <walser@...> 2003/07/28

On Monday 28 July 2003 10:27, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1321] Re: Bug 1060 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/28

Hi,

[#1309] exceptions and such — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

5 messages 2003/07/27

[#1316] Re: exceptions and such — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/27

[#1356] Re: exceptions and such — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/08/05

[#1357] Re: exceptions and such — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/08/06

Hi,

[#1374] Re: exceptions and such — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/08/08

[#1310] adding NodeDump and ii — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

7 messages 2003/07/27

[#1317] Re: adding NodeDump and ii — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/07/27

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1311] Re: adding NodeDump and ii — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1312] Re: adding NodeDump and ii — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/27

Hi,

[#1313] Re: adding NodeDump and ii — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1314] Re: adding NodeDump and ii — nobu.nokada@... 2003/07/27

Hi,

[#1315] Re: adding NodeDump and ii — ts <decoux@...> 2003/07/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1322] compile error on win32 platforms with ext/syck — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2003/07/29

[#1323] Re: compile error on win32 platforms with ext/syck — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/07/29

U.Nakamura (usa@osb.att.ne.jp) wrote:

[#1324] Re: compile error on win32 platforms with ext/syck — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2003/07/29

Hello,

[#1325] Tainting in YAML — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

I'm following Marshal's tainting code in my YAML extension. Basically,

3 messages 2003/07/29

[#1326] Re: Tainting in YAML — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/07/29

Hi,

[#1327] Re: Tainting in YAML — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/07/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto (matz@ruby-lang.org) wrote:

[#1328] Extracting a parent class — Michael Garriss <mgarriss@...>

Sorry about the newbie question but....

2 messages 2003/07/31

[#1333] Re: Extracting a parent class — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/08/03

Re: [Patch] FTP.new with block

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Date: 2003-07-19 18:11:32 UTC

List: ruby-core #1245

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> But "open" returns the last value evaluated in the block, for
> convenience, whereas "new", as I believe, should always return a new
> instance.  For me, this is more important than your reason.

Perhaps this time you should invoke the principle of least confusion... 
(although I can see the argument both ways)

If you allowed passing a block to .new, then it would be meaningless to 
return a file object, so your choices would be either nil or the block 
value. If you made it the block value, then folks wouldn't have to 
remember the difference between open and new.

There are many other methods whose return value varies if a block is 
given, so there are precedents.

Cheers

Dave

Thread

In This Thread