[#995] Mathn crashes the interpreter on PPC — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
The following code crashes the interpreter on my Powerbook:
4 messages
2003/05/01
[#1004] irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Try
7 messages
2003/05/02
[#1005] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2003/05/02
Hi,
[#1018] Re: ext/syck problems — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
U.Nakamura (usa@osb.att.ne.jp) wrote:
8 messages
2003/05/13
[#1037] ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
On my Mac OSX,
15 messages
2003/05/14
[#1039] Re: ping.rb
— Ryan Davis <ryand@...>
2003/05/15
[#1040] Re: ping.rb
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2003/05/15
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#1042] Re: ping.rb
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/05/15
Hi,
[#1043] Re: ping.rb
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2003/05/15
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#1057] Fwd: ping.rb — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>
7 messages
2003/05/16
[#1066] YAML problem — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
I found a problem with yaml.
12 messages
2003/05/22
[#1067] Re: YAML problem
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
2003/05/22
Hi,
[#1068] Re: YAML problem
— why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
2003/05/22
Concerning error from:
[#1069] Re: YAML problem
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2003/05/22
In article <20030522064450.GA14175@rysa.inetz.com>,
[#1077] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — ts <decoux@...>
10 messages
2003/05/26
[#1078] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/05/26
Hi,
[#1079] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl
— ts <decoux@...>
2003/05/26
>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#1080] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/05/26
Hi,
[#1081] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl
— ts <decoux@...>
2003/05/26
>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#1085] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/05/26
Hi,
[#1082] Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I've been having fun getting readline support to work on OSX. My latest
7 messages
2003/05/26
[#1094] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
> * eval.c (rb_mod_autoload, rb_mod_autoload_p): new method;
12 messages
2003/05/29
[#1095] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/05/29
Hi,
[#1097] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2003/05/29
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#1101] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/05/29
Hi,
[#1102] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2003/05/30
Hi,
Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin
From:
nobu.nokada@...
Date:
2003-05-26 17:32:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #1088
Hi,
At Tue, 27 May 2003 01:06:11 +0900,
Dave Thomas wrote:
> >> int main() { return 0; }
> >> int t() { void ((*volatile p)()); p = (void ((*)()))readline; return 0; }
> >> /* end */
> > Before it, isn't there this test?
> > checked program was:
> > /* begin */
> > int main() { return 0; }
> > int t() { readline(); return 0; }
> > /* end */
>
> Yes, there was... but why would it try the second one if the first one
> succeeded?
The second would not be done if the first were succeed.
> Interestingly, though, it now runs successfully. I have no idea what
> is different: I did nothing to the readline library, but running it
> again I get Ruby readline support built OK. I was seeing errors saying
> that libruby-static was out of date, so I did a make clean and a make,
> and everything just worked.
Possibly, the first test might fail to link libruby-static.
You don't keep old mkmf.log?
--
Nobu Nakada