[#1094] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

> * eval.c (rb_mod_autoload, rb_mod_autoload_p): new method;

12 messages 2003/05/29
[#1095] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/29

Hi,

Re: ext/syck problems

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-05-13 06:42:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #1020
Hi,

In message "Re: ext/syck problems"
    on 03/05/13, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:

|>   * not only tool-generated files, should there be source files?
|
|I use Yacc (gram.y -> gram.c) and re2c (token.re -> token.c, implicit.re
|-> implicit.c).  I can certainly include source files for these, but
|likely we don't want a re2c dependancy.  Should I leverage yacc since
|it's already used for Ruby's grammar?

We can assume yacc (or bison).  I have no knowledge about re2c.  Is
this your hand-made tool?

							matz.

In This Thread