[#1094] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

> * eval.c (rb_mod_autoload, rb_mod_autoload_p): new method;

12 messages 2003/05/29
[#1095] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/29

Hi,

Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-05-03 02:19:55 UTC
List: ruby-core #1010
Hi,

In message "Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work"
    on 03/05/03, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:

|So, perhaps rather than making the incompatible change to defaults, we 
|could revert to the old ones, but warn that the default will change in 
|future (and set a date for that:
|
|   Warning: instance_methods parameter will default to 'true' in Jan 2004

Sounds nice.  I was too quick.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next