ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#995] Mathn crashes the interpreter on PPC — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

The following code crashes the interpreter on my Powerbook:

4 messages 2003/05/01

[#996] Re: Mathn crashes the interpreter on PPC — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/01

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#998] Re: Mathn crashes the interpreter on PPC — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/05/01

[#999] Re: Mathn crashes the interpreter on PPC — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/05/01

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 12:56:35PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#1000] CGI::Session generating blank IDs? — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

Hmm, for some reason the latest CVS's CGI::Session seems to be

4 messages 2003/05/02

[#1001] CGI issue (was: CGI::Session generating blank IDs?) — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/05/02

On Fri, 2 May 2003 14:42:58 +0900

[#1002] CGI::Session generating blank IDs => Another CGI problem — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/05/02

On Fri, 2 May 2003 14:42:58 +0900

[#1003] Re: CGI::Session generating blank IDs => Another CGI problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/02

Hi,

[#1004] irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Try

7 messages 2003/05/02

[#1005] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/02

Hi,

[#1006] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/02

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1009] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/05/03

On Saturday, 3 May 2003 at 1:48:13 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#1007] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/02

Hi,

[#1008] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/02

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1010] Re: irb doesn't work, because tempfile doesn't work — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/03

Hi,

[#1011] "_FILE_OFFSET_BITS redefined" warning on Solaris — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2003/05/03

[#1336] "_FILE_OFFSET_BITS redefined" warning on Solaris (II) — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2003/08/04

[#1012] Re: [patch] "_FILE_OFFSET_BITS redefined" warning on Solaris — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/03

Hi,

[#1013] mutex_m and thread — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

4 messages 2003/05/05

[#1014] Re: mutex_m and thread — stillflame@... 2003/05/05

Dave Thomas writes:

[#1015] Re: mutex_m and thread — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/07

stillflame@FaerieMUD.org wrote:

[#1016] Re: mutex_m and thread — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/07

Hi,

[#1017] ext/syck problems — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2003/05/13

[#1031] Re: ext/syck problems — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/05/13

In article <20030513123008.244C.USA@osb.att.ne.jp>,

[#1033] Re: ext/syck problems — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/05/13

Tanaka Akira (akr@m17n.org) wrote:

[#1018] Re: ext/syck problems — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

U.Nakamura (usa@osb.att.ne.jp) wrote:

8 messages 2003/05/13

[#1019] Re: ext/syck problems — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2003/05/13

Hello,

[#1026] ANSI — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/05/13

[#1020] Re: ext/syck problems — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/13

Hi,

[#1027] re2c — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/05/13

On Tue, 13 May 2003 15:42:42 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1028] Re: re2c — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/13

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#1029] Re: re2c — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/05/13

Dave Thomas (dave@pragprog.com) wrote:

[#1032] Re: re2c — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/13

why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#1021] fsync() on win32 — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...>

Hi everybody,

3 messages 2003/05/13

[#1022] Re: fsync() on win32 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2003/05/13

Hello,

[#1023] Re: fsync() on win32 — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...> 2003/05/13

--- "U.Nakamura" <usa@osb.att.ne.jp> wrote:

[#1024] Syck in ext/Setup* — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Akinori MUSHA (knu@iDaemons.org) wrote:

2 messages 2003/05/13

[#1025] Syck warnings — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/13

The latest CVS is down to one warning on my Mac:

[#1030] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/ext/syck: ext/syck/handler.c (syck_hdlr_add_alias): add cast to avoid warning. — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

eban (eban@ruby-lang.org) wrote:

2 messages 2003/05/13

[#1034] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/ext/syck: ext/syck/handler.c (syck_hdlr_add_alias): add cast to avoid warning. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/14

Hi,

[#1035] Re: ANSI — "lyle@..." <lyle@...>

> I think that the whole of Ruby should move to ANSI. I don't know of any

1 message 2003/05/14

[#1036] Kill support on Win32 — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2003/05/14

[#1038] Re: Kill support on Win32 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2003/05/15

Hello,

[#1046] Re: Kill support on Win32 — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2003/05/15

U.Nakamura wrote:

[#1037] ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

On my Mac OSX,

15 messages 2003/05/14

[#1039] Re: ping.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2003/05/15

[#1040] Re: ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/15

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#1042] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#1043] Re: ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/15

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1044] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#1045] Re: ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/15

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1047] Re: ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/15

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#1049] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#1051] Re: ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/15

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1053] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#1058] Re: ping.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/16

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1052] Re: ping.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2003/05/15

[#1056] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1041] Re: ping.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#1048] Re: ping.rb — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Dave Thomas wrote:

4 messages 2003/05/15

[#1050] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#1054] Re: ping.rb — Eric Melville <eric@...> 2003/05/16

> > I believe __APPLE__ is a gcc defined macro. I dunno if CodeWarrior or

[#1055] Re: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1057] Fwd: ping.rb — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>

7 messages 2003/05/16

[#1059] Re: Fwd: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1060] Re: Fwd: ping.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1061] Re: Fwd: ping.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1062] Re: Fwd: ping.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1063] Re: ping.rb — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2003/05/16

Hi,

[#1064] Re: ping.rb — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2003/05/16

On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 09:33 AM, J.Herre wrote:

[#1065] allocate — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2003/05/19

[#1066] YAML problem — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found a problem with yaml.

12 messages 2003/05/22

[#1067] Re: YAML problem — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/05/22

Hi,

[#1068] Re: YAML problem — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/05/22

Concerning error from:

[#1070] Re: YAML problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/22

Hi,

[#1069] Re: YAML problem — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/05/22

In article <20030522064450.GA14175@rysa.inetz.com>,

[#1071] Re: YAML problem — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/05/22

In article <874r3neb7p.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#1120] Re: YAML problem — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/06/05

Tanaka Akira (akr@m17n.org) wrote:

[#1134] Re: YAML problem — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/06/06

In article <20030605060109.GA60067@rysa.inetz.com>,

[#1121] Re: YAML problem — nobu.nokada@... 2003/06/05

Hi,

[#1133] Re: YAML problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/06/06

Hi,

[#1072] Re: YAML problem — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/05/23

Hi, _why,

[#1073] Re: YAML problem — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/05/23

NAKAMURA, Hiroshi (nahi@keynauts.com) wrote:

[#1074] crash involving Qundef — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

3 messages 2003/05/25

[#1075] Re: crash involving Qundef — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1076] Re: crash involving Qundef — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1077] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — ts <decoux@...>

10 messages 2003/05/26

[#1078] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1079] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — ts <decoux@...> 2003/05/26

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1080] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1081] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — ts <decoux@...> 2003/05/26

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#1085] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1089] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1092] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — ts <decoux@...> 2003/05/27

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#1093] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — ts <decoux@...> 2003/05/28

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#1090] Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1082] Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've been having fun getting readline support to work on OSX. My latest

7 messages 2003/05/26

[#1083] Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — ts <decoux@...> 2003/05/26

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:

[#1084] Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1087] Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/26

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1088] Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/26

Hi,

[#1091] Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/26

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1086] Re: Possible problem with mkmf under Darwin — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/05/26

On Monday, 26 May 2003 at 23:41:56 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#1094] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

> * eval.c (rb_mod_autoload, rb_mod_autoload_p): new method;

12 messages 2003/05/29

[#1095] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/29

Hi,

[#1097] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/29

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1101] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/29

Hi,

[#1102] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/30

Hi,

[#1104] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/30

Hi,

[#1105] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/30

[#1106] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/30

Hi,

[#1109] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/06/01

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1111] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/06/01

Hi,

[#1096] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2003/05/29

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1098] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby, ruby/lib: * eval.c (ev_const_defined, ev_const_get), variable.c — Michael Granger <ged@...> 2003/05/29

Hi,

[#1099] Isn't NUM2UINT broken for 64-bit? — "lyle@..." <lyle@...>

All,

3 messages 2003/05/29

[#1100] Re: Isn't NUM2UINT broken for 64-bit? — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/29

Hi,

[#1103] Re: Isn't NUM2UINT broken for 64-bit? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/30

Hi,

[#1107] large file compilation issue on solaris with 1.8 — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2003/05/30

[#1108] Re: large file compilation issue on solaris with 1.8 — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2003/05/30

Re: [1.8] terminated object / invalid inspect_tbl

From: nobu.nokada@...

Date: 2003-05-26 13:44:19 UTC

List: ruby-core #1080

Hi,

At Mon, 26 May 2003 20:37:30 +0900,
> n> Must not be.
> 
>  There is also "invalid inspect_tbl" in array.c, no ?

It is fixed already in array.c 1.121.

> n> +	    if (!RCLASS(ruby_frame->last_class)->super) {
> n> +		rb_undefined(ruby_frame->self, ruby_frame->orig_func, argc, argv, 0);
> n> +	    }
> 
>  Well, someone will not understand why it work with "def initialize" and
>  don't work with "define_method(:initialize)", no ?

You're right.  I guess ruby_frame->last_class should not be a
T_MODULE but T_CLASS or T_ICLASS.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

Thread

In This Thread