[#383997] CORE - Alternative Variable Substitution — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

ruby 1.9

21 messages 2011/06/01

[#384051] CORE - Replace "if __FILE__ == $0" with "executed?" — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The construct to detect execution of the file (in order to launch main

12 messages 2011/06/02

[#384104] CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item") — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

1.9

76 messages 2011/06/04
[#384111] Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item") — James Gray <james@...> 2011/06/04

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

[#384154] Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item") — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/05

Hi,

[#384168] Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item") — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2011/06/06

On 6 撫, 01:11, Yukihiro Matsumoto <m...@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#384228] a little challenge - reproduce this error — Intransition <transfire@...>

Want to see a really amazing error I got this week? Okay... but to

24 messages 2011/06/08
[#384230] Re: a little challenge - reproduce this error — Steve Klabnik <steve@...> 2011/06/08

throw NameError.new("uninitialized constant X::Foo::X")

[#384231] Re: a little challenge - reproduce this error — John Feminella <johnf@...> 2011/06/08

This is a pretty trivial error to generate. Just reference the

[#384232] Re: a little challenge - reproduce this error — Intransition <transfire@...> 2011/06/08

[#384235] Re: a little challenge - reproduce this error — Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@...> 2011/06/08

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#384279] CORE - Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

class String

14 messages 2011/06/09

[#384280] BARRIER - require "rubygems" — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

ruby 1.9.2p180 Windows 7

30 messages 2011/06/09

[#384283] Classic Computer Science Books — Stu <stu@...>

I wanted to start a thread discussion on classic computer science

38 messages 2011/06/09
[#384288] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2011/06/10

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> wrote:

[#384289] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2011/06/10

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:22:58AM +0900, Josh Cheek wrote:

[#384291] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Stu <stu@...> 2011/06/10

Thank you for the responses. I look forward to reading others.

[#384346] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/06/11

> queue to read Meyers C++ books and Crockford's Javascript: The Good

[#384349] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Stu <stu@...> 2011/06/11

Hello Anurag

[#384430] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/06/13

Hey Stu,

[#384464] Re: Classic Computer Science Books — Vin兤ius <undvinicius@...> 2011/06/14

Wow, those are a lot of books, as a beginner programmer, I don't have

[#384322] PSA: Ilias is Crazy — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I guess I have to post this periodically since our population is growing and changing so much.

18 messages 2011/06/10

[#384363] RFC - One word alias for require_relative — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

This is a simple Request for Comments.

161 messages 2011/06/11
[#384368] Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative — Intransition <transfire@...> 2011/06/11

[#384654] Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2011/06/17

On 11 撫, 20:35, Ilias Lazaridis <il...@lazaridis.com> wrote:

[#384676] Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/17

Hi,

[#384633] Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2011/06/17

On 17 撫, 21:17, Gary Wright <gwtm...@mac.com> wrote:

[#384432] commit message conventions — Intransition <transfire@...>

When I write commit messages I add a "team" prefix to the message,

14 messages 2011/06/13
[#384433] Re: commit message conventions — John Feminella <johnf@...> 2011/06/13

I greatly dislike that style, to be frank. My commit messages usually

[#384467] A way to find out when a constant gets defined? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...>

Hi, I'd like to be able to find out when a constant gets defined. I think I

14 messages 2011/06/14

[#384490] Messages to Ruby List/Forum/etc. not arriving equally? — Markus Fischer <markus@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2011/06/15

[#384500] CORE - Inconsistent Handling of Uninitialized Variables — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

puts "\n== Testin in MAIN Context =="

18 messages 2011/06/15

[#384617] get execution name of program — Chad Perrin <code@...>

Either $0 or __FILE__ will return a filename to give context for how a

13 messages 2011/06/17

[#384634] default config file location — Chad Perrin <code@...>

Is there a "better" way to specify a default config file location than

16 messages 2011/06/17
[#384637] Re: default config file location — "Matthew K. Williams" <matt@...> 2011/06/17

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Chad Perrin wrote:

[#384648] celluloid 0.0.3: a concurrent object framework for Ruby — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>

Celluloid is a concurrent object framework for Ruby inspired by Erlang

12 messages 2011/06/17

[#384763] MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

(public draft)

46 messages 2011/06/20
[#384765] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2011/06/20

Before anyone engages this nonsense . . .

[#384772] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/06/20

On 20 Jun 2011 20:32, "Chad Perrin" <code@apotheon.net> wrote:

[#384774] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Sam Duncan <sduncan@...> 2011/06/20

Five posts in on this thread, and four of them are the self appointed

[#384779] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — David Masover <ninja@...> 2011/06/20

A quick, lazy response, because I shouldn't feed trolls anyway, and I simply

[#384788] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/06/21

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:52, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:

[#384790] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/06/21

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#384792] Re: MIDASWAD - Matz is Dumb and so We are Dumb — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/06/21

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 13:37, Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com> wrote:

[#384800] How to order a hash based on its keys? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>

Hi, I want to order a hash using itds keys:

35 messages 2011/06/21
[#384808] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/06/21

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Iki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

[#384813] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2011/06/21

2011/6/21 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>:

[#384814] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2011/06/21

2011/6/21 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>:

[#384833] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/06/22

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Iki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

[#384837] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2011/06/22

2011/6/22 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>:

[#384843] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/06/22

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Iki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

[#384846] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2011/06/22

2011/6/22 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>:

[#384847] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/06/22

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Iki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

[#384849] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2011/06/22

2011/6/22 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>:

[#384855] Re: How to order a hash based on its keys? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2011/06/22

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Iki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

[#384819] Gateway Shutting Down — James Gray <james@...>

Rubyists:

12 messages 2011/06/21

[#384873] Explicitly setting compiler to C++ in extconf.rb... — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...>

I'm trying to setup a Ruby gem that bundles the Swig-generated bindings

10 messages 2011/06/23

[#384907] SPDX (and the glazing of ones eyes) — Intransition <transfire@...>

Never ceases to amaze me how complicated "enterprisey" peoples can

17 messages 2011/06/25
[#384909] Re: SPDX (and the glazing of ones eyes) — Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@...> 2011/06/25

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#384996] A movie Renamer — Mayank Kohaley <mayank.kohaley@...>

Hello Guys,

20 messages 2011/06/29
[#385007] Re: A movie Renamer — Sam Duncan <sduncan@...> 2011/06/29

Please don't steal movies.

[#385010] Re: A movie Renamer — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2011/06/29

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:17:55AM +0900, Sam Duncan wrote:

[#385011] Re: A movie Renamer — Sam Duncan <sduncan@...> 2011/06/29

*sigh*

[#385019] A File Renamer — Mayank Kohaley <mayank.kohaley@...>

I guess this thread has spawned another issue. Let me close this and say I

18 messages 2011/06/30
[#385021] Re: A File Renamer — Jeremy Heiler <jeremyheiler@...> 2011/06/30

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Mayank Kohaley

[#385027] Re: A File Renamer — Johnny Morrice <spoon@...> 2011/06/30

> Is there a pattern to the file names you are working with? The key is

Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item")

From: David Masover <ninja@...>
Date: 2011-06-09 05:44:37 UTC
List: ruby-talk #384270
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 01:20:26 PM Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> On 8 撫, 21:00, Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackr...@googlemail.com>
> > > Has anyone asked *how* he'd react?  
> 
> Why should they ask? It's much more fun to let the paranoia do the

In other words, you mention laws that seem relevant (until I do five minutes 
of research), and that you'll have to "take action".

You see this as "not a threat", yet you admit, right here, that you don't 
clarify things because it's "more fun to let paranoia do the..." something. 
What, do the work of convincing us that it's a legal threat?

It seems pretty clear that your intention was for people to interpret this as 
a legal threat. I see only two possible interpretations: Either you actually 
do intend to threaten (or at least intimidate) people with the force of law, 
or you only make it seem as though you would do so because it's fun to see how 
people react.

So, either you are genuinely making legal threats, or you are by definition a 
troll. Now that is fun.

> > > I'm curious about what sort of
> > > reaction is even possible in this case.
> 
> There are several options, but you cannot uncover them.
> 
> I react already, but until they realize how, it'll be too late.

Well, that's ominous. Looks like you've dropped from legal threats to vague, 
unspecified threats. I'm quaking in my little boots.

Here's the funniest part:

> > It's buried in the thread, but Ilias threatens (emptily, so far) to
> > sue whoever is pointing out his trollish nature.
> 
> So much miss-information in just one sentence - just fascination!

I suppose some of it might be, but it seems pretty obvious that either you do 
make exactly those threats, or you are exactly a troll. At least one of these 
things is true, as you've demonstrated here.

> But now it's really time to close this thread.

I might exit it as well, though. Ilias is far less productive to talk to than 
the most clueless newbie, the most diehard religious fundamentalist, or the 
most stubbornly dogmatic zealot of any kind. What makes him so frustrating is 
that despite initiating the conversation (by, for example, asking a question), 
he tends to outright dismiss any responses, rather than actually argue against 
them.

Most of his responses, and nearly all of the responses to anything I wrote, 
fall into these categories:

 - Unfounded assertions.
 - "Summarizing" (read: strawmanning) messages with little sentence fragment 
summaries, and then either ignoring it or responding to the strawman.
 - Telling us what to do or how to respond, as if he owns the group or thread.
 - Threats.
 - TL;DR.

There's also the most recent, isolated case of sarcastically repeating my 
message without once pointing out what makes it so ridiculous.

Every now and then, perhaps every five or ten messages, I actually get a 
response to my point, and it's a fantastically poor response -- like earlier 
in this thread where he actually responded, once, to my observation that the 
Wikipedia article seems to be removed for notability reasons, rather than 
personal attack. The response was to take a quote from the page I linked to, 
out of context.

When I put it back in context, he gets sarcastic and reminds me that he 
doesn't take me seriously, and we're back to this crap. So there's almost a 
discussion going on, but the signal-to-noise ratio is just impossible.

I doubt his response to this message will be any different. In fact, I'd bet 
money he doesn't read this far -- TL;DR again. The killfile option is 
definitely looking more attractive all the time.

In This Thread