[#72745] [Ruby trunk - Misc #11876] [Closed] Scheduled maintenance 2016/01/01 — shibata.hiroshi@...
Issue #11876 has been updated by Hiroshi SHIBATA.
shibata.hiroshi@gmail.com wrote:
[#72824] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11973] IO#advise should raise NotImplementedError on platforms that do not support that call — git@...
Issue #11973 has been updated by Chuck Remes.
[#72954] [Ruby trunk - Feature #12010] [Assigned] Exclude dot and dotdot from Dir#each — naruse@...
Issue #12010 has been reported by Yui NARUSE.
naruse@airemix.jp wrote:
[#73313] [Ruby trunk - Bug #12007] [Open] Newly added Unicode data file doesn't get downloaded — shugo@...
Issue #12007 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#73372] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — benton@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Benton Barnett.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:13 PM, <benton@bentonbarnett.com> wrote:
[#73421] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — nekocat432@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Ruby Dino.
I’m sorry, but this, like the code of merit, is merely a derailing tactic.
On 2016/01/26 01:32, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
[#73491] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — git@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Chuck Remes.
They will never provide any numbers because they are not engineers and they
Coraline is a panelist on Ruby rogues and a very well respected member of
OK, sorry for previous comment. Let's try this way.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Kirilenko <
[#73558] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — andrew.kirilenko@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Andrew Kirilenko.
Andrew, please stop digging. Your hole is only getting deeper.
>Andrew, please stop digging. Your hole is only getting deeper.
[#73586] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — andrew@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Andrew Vit.
[#73593] [Ruby trunk - Bug #12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[ruby-core:73008] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #12010] [Assigned] Exclude dot and dotdot from Dir#each
Hello Eric, On 2016/01/20 11:43, Eric Wong wrote: > naruse@airemix.jp wrote: >> Dir#each and Dir#read) (including Dir.entries, Dir.foreach and other methods) return "." and ".." at first. >> But through the all real use case "." and ".." are useless. >> How about excluding them? > > If Ruby were a new language, yes. But I think it is too risky, now. Can somebody do a code search for this? I know AKR is good at that (but I don't want to ask him to do this). >> +#define DIR_IS_DOT_OR_DOTDOT(dp) ((dp)->d_name[0] == '.' && \ >> + ((dp)->d_name[1] == '\0' || ((dp)->d_name[1] == '.' && (dp)->d_name[2] == '\0'))) > > Anyways, I prefer we reduce macro usage and use static inline functions > to avoid potential side effects, extra '\' and parentheses. Are inline functions now an accepted concept in C? It seems they are available from C99, but then so are // comments, and they are not yet accepted in Ruby because of some old compilers. Also, are there C compilers that inline functions as part of optimization, even if they aren't marked as such in the source? While I very much understand your point re. potential side effects, using inline functions also may save space at the cost of time, in particular for long macros. Is that also one of the reasons you favor them? Regards, Martin. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>