[#1834] New syck bug — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
There is a new syck bug that appears to be caused by the recent fix for
[#1836] exit inside test/unit — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
On Dec 1, 2003, at 02:55, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#1843] DRb tests hang on OS X 10.3.1 — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I haven't yet been able to test this on another platform to see if it
[#1846] Re: Constants, class variables and the cbase field — george.marrows@...
> What kind of behavior do you want (to change)? Remember you're saying
Hi,
On Monday 01 December 2003 06:44 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 04:02 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#1884] multiple exceptions for assert_raises — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
Hi,
On Dec 4, 2003, at 02:34, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Dec 4, 2003, at 01:35, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Dec 4, 2003, at 10:39, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#1901] Test::Unit problem — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
[#1914] -Wall warnings from 1.8.1 p3 — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>
Here are some potentially significant warnings from 1.8.1 p3
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#1932] --enable-pthread broken? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
[ruby-talk: 87759] and the surrounding thread seem to indicate that
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2003, at 11:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>>>>> "N" == Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@talbott.ws> writes:
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2003, at 16:10, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2003, at 20:48, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Hi,
[#1936] Can't define +@ for Symbol (plus ruby install problem) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
I wanted to see if the +@ problem was fixed in 1.8.1 preview 3 but when I do
Hi,
On Friday 12 December 2003 02:39 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
Hi,
[#1973] Where to install documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Folks:
Hi,
Dave Thomas (dave@pragprog.com) wrote:
>
>> Using the standard install.rb, anything you include in a project's
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:52:26PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi,
[#2013] Mixin Module, Possible Bug? — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
According to Pickaxe, Ch. 19, pg. 245, under Mixin Modules:
[#2037] --enable-pthread still segfaults... — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I've finally been able to test my application under load using the
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 14:17, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 14:34, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 14:44, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
> I'm afraid you're using old configure file. Can you wipe off old
On Dec 23, 2003, at 15:18, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
In message "Re: --enable-pthread still segfaults..."
On Dec 23, 2003, at 16:34, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 17:04, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 17:29, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#2071] rdoc is broken in 1.8.1 — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>
Greetings!
[#2084] Error with Socket.getaddrinfo on OS X — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>
On OS X Panther:
[#2101] Can't call to_s on a frozen Date — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Interesting...
[#2102] syck segfaults when used in rdoc — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>
Greetings!
>>>>> "A" == Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net> writes:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 11:41:49PM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "A" == Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net> writes:
Hi,
[#2122] Bad interaction between timeout.rb and --enable-pthread — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
Here's a testcase that shows the problem:
I should have reduced it more before posting...
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Jan 1, 2004, at 11:29, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Jan 1, 2004, at 12:14, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
Re: Where to install documentation
On Dec 17, 2003, at 18:45, James Brtt wrote: > Are 'rdoc' directories only for the output of running rdoc? I'm > guessing not, but if these are directories for documentation in > general, would it not be better to call them simply 'doc'? > Yes - they're simply for rdoc output (given that that's the tool I'm writing). I certainly don't want to be telling other people where to put stuff: I just needed to make sure that I put the things I need in the correct place. > Or is there a reason to distinguish between what comes from RDoc and > other doc sources? Yes: the intermediate form that RDoc generates for ri is not for human consumption. That's what's going in to these directories. When RDoc generates HTML (or anything else, really) it will do it the same as now, defaulting to a doc subdirectory with --op used to override that. Cheers Dave