[#1834] New syck bug — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
There is a new syck bug that appears to be caused by the recent fix for
[#1836] exit inside test/unit — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
On Dec 1, 2003, at 02:55, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#1843] DRb tests hang on OS X 10.3.1 — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I haven't yet been able to test this on another platform to see if it
[#1846] Re: Constants, class variables and the cbase field — george.marrows@...
> What kind of behavior do you want (to change)? Remember you're saying
Hi,
On Monday 01 December 2003 06:44 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 04:02 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#1884] multiple exceptions for assert_raises — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
Hi,
On Dec 4, 2003, at 02:34, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Dec 4, 2003, at 01:35, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
On Dec 4, 2003, at 10:39, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#1901] Test::Unit problem — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
[#1914] -Wall warnings from 1.8.1 p3 — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>
Here are some potentially significant warnings from 1.8.1 p3
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#1932] --enable-pthread broken? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
[ruby-talk: 87759] and the surrounding thread seem to indicate that
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2003, at 11:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>>>>> "N" == Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@talbott.ws> writes:
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2003, at 16:10, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2003, at 20:48, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
Hi,
[#1936] Can't define +@ for Symbol (plus ruby install problem) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
I wanted to see if the +@ problem was fixed in 1.8.1 preview 3 but when I do
Hi,
On Friday 12 December 2003 02:39 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
Hi,
[#1973] Where to install documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Folks:
Hi,
Dave Thomas (dave@pragprog.com) wrote:
>
>> Using the standard install.rb, anything you include in a project's
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:52:26PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi,
[#2013] Mixin Module, Possible Bug? — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
According to Pickaxe, Ch. 19, pg. 245, under Mixin Modules:
[#2037] --enable-pthread still segfaults... — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I've finally been able to test my application under load using the
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 14:17, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 14:34, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 14:44, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
> I'm afraid you're using old configure file. Can you wipe off old
On Dec 23, 2003, at 15:18, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
In message "Re: --enable-pthread still segfaults..."
On Dec 23, 2003, at 16:34, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 17:04, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 23, 2003, at 17:29, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#2071] rdoc is broken in 1.8.1 — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>
Greetings!
[#2084] Error with Socket.getaddrinfo on OS X — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>
On OS X Panther:
[#2101] Can't call to_s on a frozen Date — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Interesting...
[#2102] syck segfaults when used in rdoc — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>
Greetings!
>>>>> "A" == Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net> writes:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 11:41:49PM +0900, ts wrote:
>>>>> "A" == Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net> writes:
Hi,
[#2122] Bad interaction between timeout.rb and --enable-pthread — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
Here's a testcase that shows the problem:
I should have reduced it more before posting...
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Jan 1, 2004, at 11:29, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Jan 1, 2004, at 12:14, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
Re: Where to install documentation
On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 6:05:40 PM, Gavin wrote:
>>> /usr/lib/ruby/doc/1.8/ <system documentation directory>
>>> /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/doc/1.8/ <site-wide documentation dir>
>>> ~/.ruby/doc/1.8/ <user's installed documentation>
>>
>> Except the version number should come before /doc, because it has a
>> higher precedence, I think (remember the part about documentation being
>> version specific).
> Documentation is version specific, and whether we use doc/1.8 or 1.8/doc,
> that fact is honored. I advocate doc/1.8 because I want to think "ah,
> this is where the documentation is stored" not "this is where everything
> to do with 1.8 is stored".
> I know you want to be able to "rm -rf 1.6", but I can handle one or two
> extra "rm -rf" steps in the uncommon activity of uninstalling Ruby.
> 'doc' should go higher in the directory structure than '1.8' because it is
> more general.
As a followup point, consider this.
$ ls -1 /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8
amrita
dict.rb
doc
dot
extensions
install-pkg.rb
markup
rake
rake.rb
...
You are proposing to put 'doc' in the 'site_ruby/1.8' directory, and I
have simulated that in the above listing.
But 'doc' is clearly not a sibling of 'dict.rb' or 'amrita' or 'rake'.
Therefore this directory is clearly a wrong place for it.
Furthermore, what if I created a package called 'doc', which
installed, as is custom, into the 'site_ruby/1.8/doc' directory? Big
trouble.
Now the alternative.
$ ls --expand-interesting-directories /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/
1.6
1.8
doc/1.6
doc/1.8
We could argue all day about whether 'doc' is a sensible sibling for
'1.6' and '1.8', and I couldn't argue strongly in favour. However, at
least it's not clearly wrong. And, given all the other locations
we've considered (especially that site-wide docs should be contained
within 'site_ruby'), this is the only arrangement I consider
reasonable.
More sensible would be
$ ls --expand-interesting-directories /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/
lib/1.6
lib/1.8
doc/1.6
doc/1.8
(Or even the other way around: {1.6,1.8}/{lib,doc}) But it's too late
for that.
Cheers,
Gavin