ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#1491] bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

6 messages 2003/09/01

[#1492] non-blocking mode behavior (Re: bug) — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/01

Hi,

[#1493] Re: non-blocking mode behavior (Re: bug) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/09/01

[#1494] Re: non-blocking mode behavior (Re: bug) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/09/02

In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0308312351340.932-100000@hostname.2y.net>,

[#1522] Integrating Etc support for Win32 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2003/09/06

Hi all,

[#1531] Re: non-blocking mode behavior (Re: bug) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/09/16

[#1495] |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>

5 messages 2003/09/02

[#1498] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/09/02

daz (dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk) wrote:

[#1496] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/09/02

On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 12:48:23 AM, daz wrote:

[#1497] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2003/09/02

[#1505] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2003/09/03

[#1499] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — george.marrows@...

> I like the idea, and read nearly every word (skipping some

3 messages 2003/09/02

[#1500] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/09/02

On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 4:13:48 AM, george wrote:

[#1504] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2003/09/03

[#1501] String#downcase! bug/oddness (?) — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

This may or may not be considered a bug, but I don't see it documented

2 messages 2003/09/02

[#1502] Re: String#downcase! bug/oddness (?) — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2003/09/03

> This may or may not be considered a bug, but I don't see it documented

[#1503] Re: [BUG] Additional info regarding ruby-talk:66239 — ts <decoux@...>

3 messages 2003/09/03

[#1507] Re: [BUG] Additional info regarding ruby-talk:66239 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/03

Hi,

[#1511] Re: [BUG] Additional info regarding ruby-talk:66239 — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/04

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#1506] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — george.marrows@...

(Mail originally sent privately by mistake - sorry for any confusion &

2 messages 2003/09/03

[#1508] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2003/09/03

[#1509] Re: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_with_index ) — george.marrows@...

> I hope you saw from my reply to your post that $XITER

1 message 2003/09/04

[#1510] Posting apologies - was RE: |rcr|.xv Index Variables ( *_wi th_index ) — george.marrows@...

Hi folks -- sorry for the hideous mess I've made of posting here recently

1 message 2003/09/04

[#1512] New tests — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

I was looking through the new test/ruby/* stuff just now, and notices

6 messages 2003/09/05

[#1514] Re: New tests — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/09/05

Hi, Dave,

[#1515] Re: New tests — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/09/05

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#1516] Re: New tests — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/09/05

Hi, Chad,

[#1517] Re: New tests — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/09/05

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#1513] Re: New tests — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/09/05

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#1518] Silent death of "ruby -e" — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

4 messages 2003/09/05

[#1519] Re: [bug] Silent death of "ruby -e" — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/05

Hi,

[#1520] Re: [bug] Silent death of "ruby -e" — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2003/09/05

[#1521] Re: [bug] Silent death of "ruby -e" — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/05

Hi,

[#1523] Assignment to $--, $- and the like — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

2 messages 2003/09/06

[#1524] Re: Assignment to $--, $- and the like — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/06

Hi,

[#1525] SuperCollider's new Rubyisms — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

1 message 2003/09/09

[#1526] report — "supriya bhattacharyya" <supriya_b66@...>

how can i generate a Report using ruby cgi/ruby tk.

1 message 2003/09/10

[#1527] why does it take so long? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

2 messages 2003/09/11

[#1528] Re: why does it take so long? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/11

Hi,

[#1529] PATCH: open3.rb comments misleading — Jason Creighton <androflux@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2003/09/15

[#1530] Re: PATCH: open3.rb comments misleading — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/15

Hi,

[#1532] Re: PATCH: open3.rb comments misleading — Richard Zidlicky <rz@...68k.org> 2003/09/17

On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:31:26AM +0900, Jason Creighton wrote:

[#1540] Re: PATCH: open3.rb comments misleading — Jason Creighton <androflux@...> 2003/09/17

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:46:38 +0900

[#1533] GC disable / enable question — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...>

Moi,

7 messages 2003/09/17

[#1534] Re: GC disable / enable question — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/17

Hi,

[#1535] Re: GC disable / enable question — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...> 2003/09/17

>> some code that constructs ruby objects. (I've tried without, and the

[#1536] Re: GC disable / enable question — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/17

[#1537] Re: GC disable / enable question — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/17

Hi,

[#1538] Re: GC disable / enable question — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...> 2003/09/17

Sorry, I was a bit ahead of myself: I don't have the code that caused

[#1539] Re: GC disable / enable question — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/17

Hi,

[#1541] How to debug ? — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...>

Moi,

6 messages 2003/09/19

[#1542] Re: How to debug ? — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/19

>>>>> "T" == Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@hiit.fi> writes:

[#1543] Re: How to debug ? — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...> 2003/09/19

On Friday, Sep 19, 2003, at 12:22 Europe/Helsinki, ts wrote:

[#1544] Re: How to debug ? — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/19

>>>>> "T" == Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@hiit.fi> writes:

[#1545] Re: How to debug ? — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...> 2003/09/19

> It take me a few seconds to write an extension which crash ruby : now

[#1546] Re: How to debug ? — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/19

>>>>> "T" == Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@hiit.fi> writes:

[#1547] Building 1.8.0 on Solaris with Sun CC — Albert Chin <ruby-core@...>

Anyone try building 1.8.0 on Solaris with the Sun C compiler? On

2 messages 2003/09/19

[#1548] Re: Building 1.8.0 on Solaris with Sun CC — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/20

Hi,

[#1549] Problem with xsystem in lib/mkmf.rb — Albert Chin <ruby-core@...>

xsystem in lib/mkmf.rb is defined as:

1 message 2003/09/22

[#1550] Schedule for 1.8.1? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>

Is there any kind of a timeline for the release of 1.8.1? I have some

2 messages 2003/09/23

[#1564] Re: Schedule for 1.8.1? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/24

Hi,

[#1551] Hashes as keys — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>

I was just playing around with Hash#hash and discovered that you can't use a

13 messages 2003/09/23

[#1552] Re: Hashes as keys — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/09/23

On Wednesday, 24 September 2003 at 6:21:33 +0900, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#1553] Re: Hashes as keys — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/09/23

On Wednesday, 24 September 2003 at 7:16:22 +0900, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#1554] Re: Hashes as keys — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/23

Jim Freeze [mailto:jim@freeze.org] wrote:

[#1555] Re: Hashes as keys — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2003/09/23

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#1560] Re: Hashes as keys — Jason Creighton <androflux@...> 2003/09/24

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:05:21 +0900

[#1563] Re: Hashes as keys — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/09/24

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#1565] Re: Hashes as keys — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2003/09/24

"Eugene Scripnik" wrote:

[#1566] Re: Hashes as keys — Eugene Scripnik <Eugene.Scripnik@...> 2003/09/24

Christoph wrote:

[#1568] Re: Hashes as keys — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2003/09/24

"Eugene Scripnik" wrote:

[#1569] Re: Hashes as keys — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/24

Hi,

[#1570] SciTE YAML lexer for 1.8.1 release — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/09/24

I've been working on a YAML lexer for SciTE and herr lucky_stiff has

[#1572] Re: SciTE YAML lexer for 1.8.1 release — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2003/09/24

Andy Hunt builds the win32 distribution on

[#1556] ostruct.rb patch — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>

I've been finding OpenStruct to be very useful lately, and then I discovered

9 messages 2003/09/24

[#1557] Re: ostruct.rb patch — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/09/24

Hi, Nathaniel,

[#1558] Re: ostruct.rb patch — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/24

NAKAMURA, Hiroshi [mailto:nahi@keynauts.com] wrote:

[#1559] Re: ostruct.rb patch — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2003/09/24

Hi, Nathaniel,

[#1562] Re: ostruct.rb patch — nobu.nokada@... 2003/09/24

Hi,

[#1567] Re: ostruct.rb patch — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/24

Hi,

[#1571] Re: ostruct.rb patch — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

[#1573] Re: ostruct.rb patch — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/24

Hi,

[#1561] Re: ostruct.rb patch — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2003/09/24

"Nathaniel Talbott" wrote:

[#1574] Automatic vars and setjmp — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

1 message 2003/09/25

Re: ostruct.rb patch

From: nobu.nokada@...

Date: 2003-09-24 05:59:43 UTC

List: ruby-core #1562

Hi,

At Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:26:59 +0900,
NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
> > > You can use protected method to avoid this kind of 
> > > instance_eval. Ignore me if it's intentional.
> > 
> > I hadn't thought of that. Do you think a protected method is better? I'm
> > assuming it's probably faster.

Perhaps.  The instance_eval needs to push the block whereas a
protected method doesn't.

> I think so.  From my ruby life for now, here's the only place
> where protected method lives.
> 
> It may be wrong.  Folks, tell me your "protected method" recipe
> if you have good one.

I guess you're right.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

Thread

In This Thread