[#1491] bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
6 messages
2003/09/01
[#1492] non-blocking mode behavior (Re: bug)
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/09/01
Hi,
[#1512] New tests — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
I was looking through the new test/ruby/* stuff just now, and notices
6 messages
2003/09/05
[#1533] GC disable / enable question — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...>
Moi,
7 messages
2003/09/17
[#1534] Re: GC disable / enable question
— nobu.nokada@...
2003/09/17
Hi,
[#1541] How to debug ? — Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@...>
Moi,
6 messages
2003/09/19
[#1542] Re: How to debug ?
— ts <decoux@...>
2003/09/19
>>>>> "T" == Torsten Rueger <torsten.rueger@hiit.fi> writes:
[#1551] Hashes as keys — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
I was just playing around with Hash#hash and discovered that you can't use a
13 messages
2003/09/23
[#1552] Re: Hashes as keys
— Jim Freeze <jim@...>
2003/09/23
On Wednesday, 24 September 2003 at 6:21:33 +0900, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#1556] ostruct.rb patch — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
I've been finding OpenStruct to be very useful lately, and then I discovered
9 messages
2003/09/24
[#1557] Re: ostruct.rb patch
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
2003/09/24
Hi, Nathaniel,
Re: ostruct.rb patch
From:
"Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Date:
2003-09-24 02:06:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #1558
NAKAMURA, Hiroshi [mailto:nahi@keynauts.com] wrote:
> You define == and hash, not eql? and hash, right?
> What is the purpose of redefining #hash?
Oops! I forgot that #eql?, not #==, is the #hash counterpart (there's
entirely too much Java in my past). I'll drop the redefinition of #hash.
> BTW,
>
> > + def ==(other)
> > + return false unless(other.kind_of?(OpenStruct))
> > + return @table == other.instance_eval{@table}
> > + end
>
> You can use protected method to avoid this kind of
> instance_eval. Ignore me if it's intentional.
I hadn't thought of that. Do you think a protected method is better? I'm
assuming it's probably faster.
Nathaniel
<:((><