[#14696] Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Why can you not rescue return, break, etc when they are within

21 messages 2008/01/02
[#14699] Re: Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/02

[#14738] Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...>

The community has been building a Ruby 1.9 compatibility tip list on

15 messages 2008/01/03
[#14755] Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/01/04

Hello James,

[#14772] Manual Memory Management — Pramukta Kumar <prak@...>

I was thinking it would be nice to be able to free large objects at

36 messages 2008/01/04
[#14788] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/05

I would only like to add that RMgick for example provides free method to

[#14824] Re: Manual Memory Management — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/01/07

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:49:30 +0900, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#14825] Re: Manual Memory Management — "Evan Weaver" <evan@...> 2008/01/07

Python supports 'del reference', which decrements the reference

[#14838] Re: Manual Memory Management — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/01/08

Evan Weaver wrote:

[#14911] Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

24 messages 2008/01/10

[#14976] nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>

The following just appeared in the ChangeLog

37 messages 2008/01/11
[#14977] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14978] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14979] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#14993] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/01/11

[#14980] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/01/11

[#14981] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/11

Hi,

[#14995] Re: nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:

[#15050] how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...>

Core Rubies:

17 messages 2008/01/13
[#15060] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/14

On Jan 13, 2008, at 08:54 AM, Phlip wrote:

[#15062] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/14

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#15073] Re: how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/01/14

On Jan 13, 2008, at 20:35 PM, Phlip wrote:

[#15185] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2008/01/22

[#15194] Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Jordi <mumismo@...>

A good article I have found (may have been linked by slashdot, don't know)

8 messages 2008/01/24

[#15248] Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

24 messages 2008/01/28
[#15250] Re: Symbol#empty? ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/01/28

Hi,

Re: 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it.

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
Date: 2008-01-10 21:37:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #14963
Rick DeNatale wrote:
> It's unclear to me whether or not the tracker on Rubyforge is still
> the place to report bugs against 1.9.  In any event it seems to have
> lost my account.
> 
> The past day or so, after refreshing ruby1.9 from svn, ri no longer
> works for me.

For what it's worth, I'm not seeing this.  I have an automated job that 
does a make clean, pulls the latest, and does everything from autoconf 
on to the test suite.  Then for good measure, I'm slowly accumulating 
projects that pass some portion of their test suites on ruby 1.9.

I just completely rm -rf'ed svn/ruby, did a clean checkout, reran, and 
got this:

--- Finish: 2008-01-10 16:31:17-05:00
  ...  Ruby: 828 tests, 0 failures, 5 known bugs
  ... Blder: 101 tests, 173 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
  ... HTML5: 542 tests, 1090 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
  ... Mars : 377 tests, 377 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
  ... REXML: 349 tests, 1256 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
  ... RakeC: 87 tests, 221 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors

Notes:
  * builder has patches that I haven't heard back from JimW on
  * HTML5 is just a subset of the tests
  * Mars is something of mine that isn't much of anything yet
  * REXML is the latest from the REXML SVN (vs. Ruby's)
  * RakeC is the full tests, but then packages up just the
          "contrib" tasks for use on Ruby 1.9.

$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.0 (2008-01-11 revision 0) [i686-linux]
$ irb
irb(main):001:0>

- Sam Ruby

In This Thread