[#14690] singleton-of-singleton is Class in 1.9.0 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
In 1.9.0, the singleton of a singleton is Class, while in 1.8 it was a
[#14696] Inconsistency in rescuability of "return" — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Why can you not rescue return, break, etc when they are within
Gary Wright wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 12:53 AM, Gary Wright <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:
Gary Wright wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 5:26 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#14720] bug reports about 1.9 VM — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#14738] Enumerable#zip Needs Love — James Gray <james@...>
The community has been building a Ruby 1.9 compatibility tip list on
Hello James,
On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 7, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 7, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#14740] Could someone sanity check a paragraph? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
In the section on writing C extensions for Ruby, I'm talking about
[#14747] BasicObject.instance_eval — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
I'm looking at converting some code over from BlankSlate to BasicObject,
On Jan 3, 2008 10:06 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
[#14772] Manual Memory Management — Pramukta Kumar <prak@...>
I was thinking it would be nice to be able to free large objects at
On Jan 4, 2008 1:25 PM, Pramukta Kumar <prak@fortiusone.com> wrote:
I would only like to add that RMgick for example provides free method to
Marcin Raczkowski wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:49:30 +0900, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:
Python supports 'del reference', which decrements the reference
Evan Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:35:28 +0900, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:
[#14811] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Paul,
[#14813] Changes in block_given? in 1.9 — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>
The following code output differs between 1.8 and 1.9:
[#14816] Fibers clear thread-specific data? — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>
Is this behavior intentional?
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 09:34:35 +0900, "Tony Arcieri" <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 1:29 PM, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 11:12 +0900, Tony Arcieri wrote:
[#14829] Finding I need explicit "GC.start" in my programs to prevent extreme growth. — Ron Mayer <rm_rails@...>
Short summary:
[#14839] Re: Embedding 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Moved over from ruby-talk...
Dave Thomas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:04:03AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#14845] Some (accidental?) syntax changes 1.8 -> 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hello,
[#14871] p returning its argument? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
On Jan 9, 2008 1:14 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#14877] Array#count returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#14884] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>
Hi,
[#14885] Segmentation fault when calling procs — Chris "ク" Heath <chris@...>
Hi,
[#14911] Draft of some pages about encoding in Ruby 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Folks:
Hi,
Hello Dave,
>
Hi,
Hi,
[#14943] Re: Really strange GC behaviour: Was [BUG] memory leak? — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>
[#14959] 1.9 RI blowing up, not sure where to report it. — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
It's unclear to me whether or not the tracker on Rubyforge is still
Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#14965] Before I create a ticket — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Is it reasonable to expect the following to produce differing counts
[#14976] nil encoding as synonym for binary encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>
The following just appeared in the ChangeLog
Hi,
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas schrieb:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
David Flanagan wrote:
[#15044] Build failures 15007-15013 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
Just FYI, starting with 15007, I am not able to do a successful build.
[#15050] how to "borrow" the RDoc::RubyParser and HTMLGenerator — Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Core Rubies:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 08:54 AM, Phlip wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 20:35 PM, Phlip wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 18:19 PM, Phlip wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008, at 15:01 PM, Phlip wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008, at 17:57 PM, Phlip wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
[#15056] How to use "addr2line" — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#15069] native_mutex_destroy return non-zero: 16 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
Yesterday, I got ruby-openid to work with Ruby 1.9, rev 15006
Hi,
[#15083] Why @hash ||= Hash.new in Set#initialize? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#15092] Module/Class definitions cannot take non literal blocks — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi list
Hi --
On Jan 16, 2008 1:23 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#15098] Bug in Date::Infinity#<=> — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hi all,
[#15102] REXML::Element.write is deprecated. See REXML::Formatters — Phlip <phlip2005@...>
okay, I saw them. Now what?
Phlip wrote:
> Meanwhile try something like the following:
Phlip wrote:
> I guess I'll let Sean take it from here, other than to note that .to_s
[#15131] test/rdoc/test_simple_markup_attribute_manager.rb:2:in `require': no such file to load -- rdoc/markup/simple_markup/inline (LoadError) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
test-all failed as follows.
> test-all failed as follows.
[#15143] Build error, revisions 15119-15126 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
This change:
[#15147] String initialziation — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...>
Mayby strange question but what happens when someone for example types
Marcin Raczkowski pisze:
Gary Wright wrote:
Marcin Raczkowski schrieb:
> What's your use case? Just curious.
[#15155] an example of performance improvements — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
For those not reading ruby-dev, I just wanted to point to
[#15164] convert rubynode transforms back into source code? — Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Rubiods:
[#15185] Friendlier methods to compare two Time objects — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...>
Hello,
At 05:42 08/01/23, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
Hi,
A new thought:
[#15194] Can large scale projects be successful implemented around a dynamic programming language? — Jordi <mumismo@...>
A good article I have found (may have been linked by slashdot, don't know)
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:17:34 +0900, James Gray wrote:
Jay Levitt wrote:
Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#15199] Two build issues — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
1. If the directory pointed to by --prefix is a symbolic link, then
[#15212] case when syntax changed ??? — "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@...>
did the case when syntax changed with 1.9 ???
[#15217] ruby-1.9.0-0 and Tk — "Yvon Thoraval" <yvon.thoraval@...>
I had successfully tested ruby 1.9 (early december 2007) with Tk, but right
[#15234] Gem install error on head — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I built HEAD into a totally clean destination (so there were no
On 27/01/2008, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#15236] Encoding of unicode strings is now ASCII-8BIT? — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
Before:
[#15238] CI for Ruby core? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Perhaps it's time to set up a continuous integration server for ruby
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008 4:01 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#15248] Symbol#empty? ? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
[#15257] a new kind of assertion — Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Ruby-core:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:45 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
Meinrad Recheis wrote:
+1
Jim Cropcho wrote:
[#15288] Circular dependency: revision 15317 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
http://intertwingly.net/projects/ruby19/logs/ruby.html
[#15297] Deletion of element sequence in an Array — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Hi!
[#15303] Core team, I need your help — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>
Hi,
[#15308] IRHG - TNODE Documentation? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Is there any documentation on the TNODE
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:42:29PM +0900, Charles Thornton wrote:
Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love
Hi,
In message "Re: Enumerable#zip Needs Love"
on Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:15:56 +0900, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> writes:
|Matz, at least this much of my proposal seems uncontested. Can you
|tell us the reason for the new behavior?
The rationales behind the changes were:
(a) stopping at the shortest
adopting the behavior from python where I took the idea of zip
method. I saw some use cases that the shortest stop may
helpful. Besides that it's much simpler to implement. But
there's still room for you to persuade me.
(b) return value
My estimation was that zip was mostly used for iteration, and
there's little need to get an array from zip, so that it is more
convenient to keep consistency with other enumerator returning
methods in Enumerable.
But use-case is more important than theoretical rationale. There are
several options we can take:
(1) easiest way - keeping 1.9 as it is.
no additional work required, but you have to stand the change
from 1.8; this might not be a good idea.
(2) 2nd easiest way - zip without block returns an array
this one is rather easy too. instead of returning Enumerator,
we can return a zipped array. The performance issue can also be
solved for this use-case.
(3) hardest way - (2) + honoring length of the receiver
I am not sure how to implement it yet. but if it is REALLY
needed this one is the way to go?
Any opinion?
matz.