[#41581] Ruby 1.6.7 dieing of segfault — Dossy <dossy@...>

I've got something that's fairly reproducible in 1.6.7. Is

11 messages 2002/06/02
[#41582] Re: Ruby 1.6.7 dieing of segfault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu.nokada@...> 2002/06/02

Hi,

[#41660] dynamic attr_accessor?? — Markus Jais <mjais@...>

hello

16 messages 2002/06/03

[#41755] HTML Parser suggestions wanted — Ned Konz <ned@...>

I've written an HTML parser that builds trees from HTML source. After

13 messages 2002/06/04

[#41809] eval and local variable — "Park Heesob" <phasis@...>

15 messages 2002/06/05

[#41819] mod_ruby and module space — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

It seems that if I execute a script using mod_ruby, I cannot call

18 messages 2002/06/05

[#41867] Pascal-like 'with' statement? — Philip Mak <pmak@...>

Is there something like Pascal's with statement? I'd like to turn this

18 messages 2002/06/06

[#41919] 1-second events — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

I need to create an event that occurs exactly once per second.

15 messages 2002/06/06

[#42086] ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3 — Sean Russell <ser@...>

<posted & mailed>

31 messages 2002/06/09
[#42091] Re: ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2002/06/09

<posted & mailed>

[#42092] RE: ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3 — <james@...> 2002/06/09

> Well, XMLSchema may be troublesome to interpret, but it isn't

[#42192] ruby-dev summary 17252-17356 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2002/06/11
[#42290] Re: a new block parameter/variable notation (Re: ruby-dev summary 17252-17356) — Kent Dahl <kentda@...> 2002/06/12

Not wanting to flog a dead horse, but I just wonder what the final word

[#42295] Re: a new block parameter/variable notation (Re: ruby-dev summary 17252-17356) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/06/12

Hi,

[#42455] Application server & web developement enviroment — "Radu M. Obad磚 <whizkid@...>

Howdy,

14 messages 2002/06/14
[#42459] Re: Application server & web developement enviroment — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2002/06/14

On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:55:31 +0900, Radu M. Obadwrote:

[#42472] ANN: Programmierung in Ruby — "Juergen Katins" <katins.juergen@...>

Programmierung in Ruby Online gibt es jetzt mit ausfrlichem

14 messages 2002/06/14

[#42504] Are Unix tools just slow? — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...>

Awhile back I was asking for help with a unixy way to search the mounted

48 messages 2002/06/14
[#42506] Re: Are Unix tools just slow? — Rick Bradley <rick@...> 2002/06/14

* Chris Gehlker (gehlker@fastq.com) [020614 17:18]:

[#42512] Re: Are Unix tools just slow? — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...> 2002/06/15

On 6/14/02 3:34 PM, "Rick Bradley" <rick@rickbradley.com> wrote:

[#42513] opengl for ruby, please help — ccos <ccos@...> 2002/06/15

unix newby failing miserably here:

[#42516] Re: Are Unix tools just slow? — "Daniel P. Zepeda" <daniel@...> 2002/06/15

On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:14:38 +0900

[#42507] mpg123 — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2002/06/14

[#42546] File.new('foo', 0600 , 'wb') — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

21 messages 2002/06/15
[#42552] Re: File.new('foo', 0600 , 'wb') — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/06/15

Dossy wrote:

[#42591] Kernel#select questions — Wilkes Joiner <boognish23@...>

I'm trying to track down a bug where Kernel#select is returning [[],[],[]] as

12 messages 2002/06/17

[#42617] eRuby on Mac OS X — Jim Menard <jimm@...>

I've searched ruby-talk for this topic, and the only messages I found show

13 messages 2002/06/17

[#42674] REXML in C — "Radu M. Obad磚 <whizkid@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2002/06/18

[#42771] Why is I/O slow? — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...>

Ok, folk, time to try again. It's nothing to do with SHA-1.

61 messages 2002/06/20
[#42831] Re: Why is I/O slow? — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...> 2002/06/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#42836] RE: Why is I/O slow? — "Mike Campbell" <michael_s_campbell@...> 2002/06/21

> With respect, this doesn't sound like a smart idea. The glibc folk have

[#42838] Re: Why is I/O slow? — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2002/06/21

On Thursday 20 June 2002 10:10 pm, Mike Campbell wrote:

[#42839] Re: Why is I/O slow? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2002/06/21

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:16:24 +0900, Albert Wagner wrote:

[#42928] GOOD DEAL — "DR. ISA BELLO" <dr_isa@...>

FROM:DR ISA BELLO

11 messages 2002/06/22

[#42982] No exceptions from String#to_i — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I've been bitten by this before... maybe

19 messages 2002/06/24
[#42983] Re: No exceptions from String#to_i — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/24

>>>>> "H" == Hal E Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:

[#42986] Re: No exceptions from String#to_i — Nikodemus Siivola <tsiivola@...> 2002/06/24

[#43122] Re: help (ruby-talk ML) — Benjamin Peterson <bjsp123@...>

20 messages 2002/06/27
[#43123] Re: help (ruby-talk ML) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/06/27

Benjamin Peterson <bjsp123@yahoo.com> writes:

[#43124] RE: help (ruby-talk ML) — Bob Calco <robert.calco@...> 2002/06/27

Yes, I would gladly volunteer considerable effort to this end. I have

[#43147] Ruby on Mac OS X — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

24 messages 2002/06/28

[#43174] eruby SAFE question — Dylan Northrup <docx@...>

I'm trying to implement a replacement for the standard apache file listings

39 messages 2002/06/28
[#43249] documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/06/30

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#43250] Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/06/30

Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> writes:

[#43255] RE: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — <james@...> 2002/06/30

>

[#43280] Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — "Juergen Katins" <juergen.katins@...> 2002/07/01

Tobias Reif wrote

[#43282] Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/07/01

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Juergen Katins wrote:

[#43381] RE: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — <james@...> 2002/07/02

> From: David Alan Black [mailto:dblack@candle.superlink.net]

RE: ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3

From: <james@...>
Date: 2002-06-10 05:23:34 UTC
List: ruby-talk #42128
> Hmm.  Ok.  What I meant was that I sort of feel obligated to provide a
> mechanism by which you can validate XML documents with REXML.  The
> /efficient/ way to do this is report validation errors while
> parsing; the
> extensible way to do this is to parse the entire document and
> then validate
> the document.  Of course, this means that hooking validation into the
> streaming parsers will be more difficult.

Are there validation schemes that require the entire document be in memory
before validation can occur?  How many schemes allow for validation while
token parsing?  I'm just wondering how much more efficient it is to
validate while parsing, if the parser is otherwise only concerned with
balanced angle braces and nested tags.

>
> Validation issues consume a large part of the XML spec.
> Personally, I'd be
> happy to ignore validation altogether -- for REXML to solve most
> people's
> needs, it'll need some sort of validation mechanism, though.

Why do you say that? My admittedly distorted view of things suggests that
validation is desirable in only a small number of cases.

>
> > Maybe it should pass back the results of validation, and perhaps have a
> > means for updating the REXML document based on post-validation
> processing
> > (e.g., default attributes & values provided by the PSVI ).
>
> Ya lost me.

I mean that something like a DTD can define implied attributes and values,
so a document instance can omit them; the validation process adds them.  My
DTD can specify that element 'foo' always has to have a 'bar' attribute,
and if foo shows up in the instance document *without* bar, then the parser
must behave as if it were there, with some default value.  Not sure how
REXML would do this, though simply adding it to the instance doc would
perhaps be easiest.  Then there's the Post Schema Validation Infoset, which
takes this idea further.



> For me, this boils down to: "Of the
> users of REXML, what is the schema language that they're most
> likely going to /need/?"

Well, for me, it's none.

> I'm just here to provide solutions, not dictate how
> you work.

Still, given a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.


W3C Schemas look a bit like a solution in search of a problem.  Perhaps too
many database people thinking, "well, if we ever get around to using XML,
we're going to need certain things ..." Or vendors realizing that they'll
sell more tools if it gets to hard to roll your own.


James

In This Thread