[#3101] Compile_err — "Fergus Hayman" <shayman@...>
[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3110] my wish list for Ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#3119] Re: Min and max? — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "M" == Mathieu Bouchard <matju@CAM.ORG> writes:
[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>
Hi,
[#3154] 3-d arrays? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Is there an idiom for 3-dimensional arrays in Ruby? I see that
[#3167] ruby.h needed to compile Interbase module — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>
Hi all,
[#3189] BUG or something? — "Park Hee Sob" <phasis@...>
Hi,
[#3221] Re: Ruby & Interbase -- Please answer if you know! — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "J" == Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@tin.it> writes:
[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Robert Feldt wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard <matju@cam.org> wrote:
[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had
Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:
On 12 Jun 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.
Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
[#3331] Selling Rubies by the Carat — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3338] PID of child processes — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
[#3363] chomp! — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
I was looking at the documentation for chomp and chomp! - and the results of chomp startled me to say the least.
[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>
I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with
[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>
Hi All,
Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@tin.it> writes:
Hi,
"NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@keynauts.com> writes:
Hi, Dave,
Hello,
[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
[#3515] Options database (was: Define & Include?) — claird@... (Cameron Laird)
In article <8ikot4$ki$0@216.39.170.247>, Dave LeBlanc <whisper@oz.net> wrote:
[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep
In message "[ruby-talk:03516] Deep copy?"
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
[#3532] Extension in C++? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
[#3541] function objects? — Johann Hibschman <johann@...>
Hi folks,
[#3544] A small quiz — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3588] Interface polymorphism — hal9000@...
Another question, guys.
[#3607] Is there a statistician in the house? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3662] Ruby 1.4.5 install from Mandrake cooker rpms ?problem? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...>
This is the first time that I've installed ruby, so
[#3685] no traffic — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi,
[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...
We are all busy learning the new language
Hi,
Hi,
Hi, matz,
Hi,
Hi,
[#3699] Multithreaded/Embedded Ruby? — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>
Is there any information on Thread safety in ruby. Suppose I embed Ruby in a
Hi,
[ruby-talk:03501] Re: Nominally frozen classes (was Static Typing (was ...))
"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes: > One reason for wanting some sort of (optional) _nominal_ frozen classes in > Ruby is so that one could build libraries and such on "solid ground" as it > were, and thus _warn_ users (-w style, or perhaps raise an exception if > requested) if the initially presupposed relevant environment was changed > from under them. Some set of class freezing options may be desirable to > specify which sorts of class modifications to freeze out and which to > permit, and whether to propagate freezing to related classes. But ho could that work in practice? My code uses your code. One day, you decide to change the meaning of method xyz, that my code uses. Freezing doesn't help. Or take the case of Complex in the standard lib/, which goes messing around in Bignum, Math, Float, and Numeric. Would we no longer be able to use it? There's a convention that library writers ust follow, a kind of inverse 'droit de seigneur': no messing with inferior classes. But as Complex illustrates, one man's messing is another man's reason for existence. I don't see how you can automate any checks to stop this. What _might_ be interesting is to consider the possibility of interfaces (or protocols)--the idea that an object must respond to a certain set of messages. That would provide a limited but still meaningful kind of type checking. It also decouples the idea of type from the implementation using classes, a concept that I like a lot. It means that one object may have many types, which is a reflection of reality. We may even find a way of using the existing mixin mechanism to implement this. Dave