[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11524] Re: Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby

From: jeremy@... (Jeremy Henty)
Date: 2001-02-25 09:40:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11524
In article <01022420381100.28356@starcrusher>,
 "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@mindspring.com> writes:
>On Saturday 24 February 2001 20:10, -kn wrote:
>> >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:
>>
>> ..-
>>
>> | Hi all: I was just at Amazon looking at the reviews for Programming Ruby,
>> | and frankly, they suck. To be more accurate, they are more negative about
>> | Ruby than about the book.
>> (...)
>>
>>  ... if those people took the time to
>> fill a negative review / opinion on amazon.com probably is there something
>> in the way ruby is perceived that triggers those reactions. It would be
>> interesting to investigate that.
>>
> ... Frequently, the negatives on anything show up first (I've
>attended a _ton_ of project meetings too!)  to be followed by more
>reasoned analyses of the pros and cons.

That may be true of project meetings but it's not IMHO true of Amazon.
My experience is that almost everything gets rave reviews, even when
it's clearly drivel.  Bad reviews are rare.  Almost uniformly bad
reviews are *very* rare.  (I mostly surf science books, maybe it's
different for programming.)

>Frankly, I don't put too much stock in reviews by non-professionals
>(and even with them have to consider how they are paid, and who pays
>their bosses) but most of them _do_ try to provide some justification
>for their conclusions and in the context of greater issues beyond the
>subject at hand. I'm more likely to be influenced by DDJ, Linux
>Journal or the IBM publications regarding computers and technology
>than by anything I might see at Amazon's site.

That's very wise of you.  I just hope that the people who will make a
difference to Ruby are similarly wise.

Cheers, 

Jeremy Henty 

In This Thread