[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83613] [Ruby trunk Bug#14068] Unused refinement breaks method search
From:
mame@...
Date:
2017-10-30 07:27:44 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83613
Issue #14068 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
----------------------------------------
Bug #14068: Unused refinement breaks method search
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14068
* Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda)
* Target version: 2.5
* ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-10-30 trunk 60565) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The following is an expected behavior.
~~~
module M1
def foo
p "M1#foo"
end
end
module M2
end
include M1
include M2
foo() #=> "M1#foo"
~~~
But, defining UnusedRefinement that refines M2, breaks the behavior, even if it is entirely not used.
~~~
module M1
def foo
p "M1#foo"
end
end
module M2
end
module UnusedRefinement # <=== INSERTED
refine(M2) do
def foo
p "M2#foo"
end
end
end
include M1
include M2
foo() #=> test.rb:20:in `<main>': undefined method `foo' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
~~~
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>