[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83153] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
From:
Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
Date:
2017-10-06 08:38:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83153
On 2017/10/06 15:22, Alberto Almagro wrote: > Well, Matz told us a the Euruko conference that this wasn’t his language anymore but the community's. He told us, he created it but it was our responsibility as a community to keep it growing and changing. You mentioned before this was requested uncountable times. If a language which claims to be for the programmer's joy isn’t able to simply alias one method requested uncountable times I don’t see how can I justify this better than with uncountable language users votes. Isn’t that far more than enough? Two points: - This is probably less of an issue now that we have the "did you mean?" gem. It immediately points to # include? when using #includes?. There are many other points where programming languages are not exactly the same as natural languages. - It's probably not the first time that Matz has said that he considers Ruby the community's language. But that doesn't mean that every request for additional aliases (and other features) will just be integrated. If we did this, we might end up with a horrible hodgepodge of a language. So Matz won't say: "I don't need it, so it's not needed in Ruby.", but that doesn't mean that he will add all requests. Regards, Martin. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>