[#80531] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
SASADA Koichi <ko1@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 2017/04/02 11:35, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 9:33, Eric Wong wrote:
On 2017/05/08 10:53, SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 12:01, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 15:36, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 12:38, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 14:12, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 15:23, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Thank you.
[#80763] [Ruby trunk Feature#13434] better method definition in C API — naruse@...
Issue #13434 has been updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE).
[#80844] [Ruby trunk Bug#13503] Improve performance of some Time & Rational methods — watson1978@...
Issue #13503 has been updated by watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita).
[#80892] [Ruby trunk Misc#13514] [PATCH] thread_pthread.c (native_sleep): preserve old unblock function — ko1@...
Issue #13514 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2017/04/27 8:58, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:80777] [Ruby trunk Bug#13390] MinGW build test-all SEGV, issue in test framework or error recovery?
Issue #13390 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
This patch is no longer needed as of builds around `ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-04-17 trunk 58383) [x64-mingw32]`. It may return when I get around to building 2.4 and 2.3 stable branches. Please close.
----------------------------------------
Bug #13390: MinGW build test-all SEGV, issue in test framework or error recovery?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13390#change-64367
* Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-03-31 trunk 58222) [x64-mingw32]
* Backport: 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Today, while building trunk (64 bit MinGW), I had a 'no output' SEGV during test-all.
I think I've had this before, but I don't recall how recently, 32 or 64, etc.
The problem is in the following test:
File ['test/ruby/test_keyword.rb', line 310](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/test/ruby/test_keyword.rb#L310-L333)
```ruby
310 def test_required_keyword
311 feature7701 = '[ruby-core:51454] [Feature #7701] required keyword argument'
312 o = Object.new
313 assert_nothing_raised(SyntaxError, feature7701) do
314 eval("def o.foo(a:) a; end", nil, "xyzzy")
315 eval("def o.bar(a:,**b) [a, b]; end")
316 end
317 assert_raise_with_message(ArgumentError, /missing keyword/, feature7701) {o.foo}
318 assert_raise_with_message(ArgumentError, /unknown keyword/, feature7701) {o.foo(a:0, b:1)}
319 begin
320 o.foo(a: 0, b: 1)
321 rescue => e
322 assert_equal('xyzzy', e.backtrace_locations[0].path)
323 end
324 assert_equal(42, o.foo(a: 42), feature7701)
325 assert_equal([[:keyreq, :a]], o.method(:foo).parameters, feature7701)
326
327 bug8139 = '[ruby-core:53608] [Bug #8139] required keyword argument with rest hash'
328 assert_equal([42, {}], o.bar(a: 42), feature7701)
329 assert_equal([42, {c: feature7701}], o.bar(a: 42, c: feature7701), feature7701)
330 assert_equal([[:keyreq, :a], [:keyrest, :b]], o.method(:bar).parameters, feature7701)
331 assert_raise_with_message(ArgumentError, /missing keyword/, bug8139) {o.bar(c: bug8139)}
332 assert_raise_with_message(ArgumentError, /missing keyword/, bug8139) {o.bar}
333 end
```
Now, the part where it gets fun is that I originally thought the error was between lines 319-323. I moved out of the build framework, simplified it, and things seemed okay. All errors were raised, backtraces were correct, etc.
As I tested further, here's what I found:
1. If lines 317 & 318 are commented out, the 319-323 block runs as it should, or line 322 is 'correct'.
2. If lines 317 & 318 are **not** commented out, line 320 must be commented out for the method to finish.
3. Otherwise, a 'no output' SEGV...
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>