[#41431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

27 messages 2011/12/01
[#41442] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/01

[#41443] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

Maybe we can add a new arity_range method that does this?

[#41496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714][Open] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

22 messages 2011/12/06

[#41511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Nick Quaranto <nick@...>

13 messages 2011/12/07

[#41557] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

14 messages 2011/12/08

[#41586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

17 messages 2011/12/10

[#41672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

13 messages 2011/12/15

[#41681] Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Since Ruby is built on top of simple concepts, most of the documentation

23 messages 2011/12/15
[#41683] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/15

[#41686] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 15-12-2011 19:23, Gary Wright escreveu:

[#41717] Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

In Windows, when using File.join, one often ends with a path containing

13 messages 2011/12/19
[#41719] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrote:

[#41720] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

Luis Lavena wrote in post #1037331:

[#41728] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Open] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2011/12/19

[#41799] Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/12/24
[#41800] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

2011/12/24 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#41811] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/26

Hello,

[#41817] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/26

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#41812] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/12/26

[ruby-core:41463] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5703][Open] Ruby 1.9.3p0 segmentation fault (during autoload?)

From: Bryan Helmkamp <bryan@...>
Date: 2011-12-03 20:54:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #41463
Issue #5703 has been reported by Bryan Helmkamp.

----------------------------------------
Bug #5703: Ruby 1.9.3p0 segmentation fault (during autoload?)
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5703

Author: Bryan Helmkamp
Status: Open
Priority: High
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 
ruby -v: -


I've been getting intermittent segfaults that appear to be coming out of autoload. Originally, I experienced them on 1.9.2p290, but they persisted after upgrading to 1.9.3p0. I thought the issue might have been #5047, but it seems not.

Here's an example:

/data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/elements/content_type_element.rb:3: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [i686-linux]

-- Control frame information -----------------------------------------------
c:0084 p:0011 s:0353 b:0353 l:000352 d:000352 CLASS  /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/elements/content_type_element.rb:3
c:0083 p:0009 s:0351 b:0351 l:000350 d:000350 TOP    /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/elements/content_type_element.rb:2
c:0082 p:---- s:0349 b:0349 l:000348 d:000348 FINISH
c:0081 p:0027 s:0347 b:0347 l:000346 d:000346 METHOD /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/fields/content_type_field.rb:37
c:0080 p:0055 s:0344 b:0344 l:000343 d:000343 METHOD /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/fields/content_type_field.rb:31
c:0079 p:0165 s:0340 b:0340 l:000339 d:000339 METHOD /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/fields/content_type_field.rb:23
c:0078 p:---- s:0335 b:0335 l:000334 d:000334 FINISH
c:0077 p:---- s:0333 b:0333 l:000332 d:000332 CFUNC  :new
c:0076 p:0982 s:0328 b:0328 l:000327 d:000327 METHOD /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/field.rb:211
c:0075 p:0021 s:0322 b:0320 l:000319 d:000319 METHOD /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/field.rb:146
c:0074 p:0057 s:0313 b:0313 l:000312 d:000312 METHOD /data/codeclimate/shared/bundled_gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.0/lib/mail/field.rb:79
c:0073 p:---- s:0307 b:0307 l:000306 d:000306 FINISH

Full output is at: https://raw.github.com/gist/5c7921f33908a3780779/d0f99051bda6f8cefbaf390ad54f13de09d24f5a/gistfile1.txt

The segfault occurs at different lines each time, but it always seems to be associated with loading new code (note rb_autoload_load in the C-level stack). The mail gem does not appear to have any C extensions, so I don't think it is an issue with that gem.

If more information is needed, I can try to collect, however it's fairly difficult because it occurs intermittently and in a daemon (Resque).

Any help would be appreciated.

-Bryan




-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next