[#24648] [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1852: Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present

20 messages 2009/08/01
[#24649] Re: [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/08/01

In article <4a73e51b5a4f9_138119f2a982704e@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,

[#24652] Re: [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/08/01

> Is it valuable to implement such function?

[#24682] Re: [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/08/02

In article <67e307490908010125r6fa76654pa8e2224f714588fc@mail.gmail.com>,

[#24673] [Feature #1857] install *.h and *.inc — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1857: install *.h and *.inc

21 messages 2009/08/01

[#24732] [Bug #1873] MatchData#[]: Omits All But Last Captures Corresponding to the Same Named Group — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1873: MatchData#[]: Omits All But Last Captures Corresponding to the Same Named Group

12 messages 2009/08/03

[#24775] [Feature #1889] Teach Onigurma Unicode 5.0 Character Properties — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Feature #1889: Teach Onigurma Unicode 5.0 Character Properties

30 messages 2009/08/05

[#24786] [Bug #1893] Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #1893: Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising

24 messages 2009/08/06
[#28422] [Bug #1893] Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/02

Issue #1893 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#28438] Re: [Bug #1893] Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/03/03

Hi,

[#24854] embedding ruby 1.9 frustration — Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2009/08/10

[#24982] [Feature #1961] Kernel#__dir__ — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

Feature #1961: Kernel#__dir__

26 messages 2009/08/19
[#28898] [Feature #1961] Kernel#__dir__ — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/03/23

Issue #1961 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#28900] Re: [Feature #1961] Kernel#__dir__ — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/03/23

On 23.03.10 19:10, Roger Pack wrote:

[#25025] [Backport #1975] Backport Dir.mktmpdir — Kirk Haines <redmine@...>

Backport #1975: Backport Dir.mktmpdir

12 messages 2009/08/21

[#25041] Proposal: Simpler block format — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

I'd like to propose that we add the following syntax for procs in Ruby:

45 messages 2009/08/23
[#25046] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Caleb Clausen <caleb@...> 2009/08/23

Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#25049] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/08/23

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Caleb Clausen <caleb@inforadical.net>wrote:

[#25058] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/08/23

Hi,

[#25059] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/08/23

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>wrote:

[#25063] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/08/23

Hi --

[#25068] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/08/24

Hi,

[#25086] [Bug #1991] ruby should use twolevel namespace on OS X — Michal Suchanek <redmine@...>

Bug #1991: ruby should use twolevel namespace on OS X

12 messages 2009/08/24

[#25208] Module#prepend and Array#prepend — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

Matz,

23 messages 2009/08/30

[#25210] [Feature #2022] Patch for ruby-1.8.6 and openssl-1.0 — Jeroen van Meeuwen <redmine@...>

Feature #2022: Patch for ruby-1.8.6 and openssl-1.0

15 messages 2009/08/30

[#25220] [Bug #2026] String encodings are not supported by most of IO on Linux — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>

Bug #2026: String encodings are not supported by most of IO on Linux

18 messages 2009/08/31

[ruby-core:25076] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format

From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Date: 2009-08-24 05:15:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #25076
To say it another way, I think it's simplifying to the programmer to be able
to explain:
"return goes up to the nearest def"

-- Yehuda

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the proposal is:
> def { something }
>
> or
>
> def do
>   something
> end
>
> which would declare a lambda. I think differences between lambda and method
> are quite small--small enough to justify collapsing ideas in the mind of the
> programmer. Here are similarities:
>
>    - Declared arguments are mandatory
>    - return inside "method" returns from method, not the lexically
>    enclosing block
>    - yield inside "method" yields to block passed into method, not the
>    lexically enclosing block
>
> Differences:
>
>    - Method has "self" belonging to its object -- lambda inherits self
>    from its lexical scope.
>
> However, this just means that lambdas are methods bound to the current
> scope.
>
> In constrast, procs are different:
>
>    - Declared arguments are optional
>    - return inside proc or block returns from the lexically enclosing
>    block
>    - yield inside proc of block yields to block passed into lexically
>    enclosing block
>
> In essence, we have two different constructs here, with four different ways
> to describe them (method, lambda, proc, block). All I am suggesting is that
> we collapse down the four ways to describe into the two actual constructs :)
>
> -- Yehuda
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In message "Re: [ruby-core:25068] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format"
>>     on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:03:53 +0900, brian ford <brixen@gmail.com>
>> writes:
>>
>> |Could we add def {} and see by usage which prevails? Or take a
>> |world-wide vote (perhaps weighted by number of lines of Ruby code
>> |written by the voter)?
>>
>> The def keyword is to define a method.  I assume your def {} proposal
>> is to declare an anonymous procedure object, which is NOT a method at
>> all.  For me, the difference is big enough to reject the proposal.
>>
>>                                                        matz.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Yehuda Katz
> Developer | Engine Yard
> (ph) 718.877.1325
>



-- 
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325

In This Thread