[#1147] Copying RVALUE — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Hello, everyone. Hope you are all doing well.

18 messages 2003/06/17
[#1155] Re: Copying RVALUE — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/06/20

Hi,

[#1157] Re: Copying RVALUE — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2003/06/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto (matz@ruby-lang.org) wrote:

[#1173] class.c code cleanup (rb_class_*_instance_methods) — Matthew Dempsky <jivera@...>

Hi, I'm new to this mailing list so I don't know the procedure for

15 messages 2003/06/22
[#1174] Re: [Patch] class.c code cleanup (rb_class_*_instance_methods) — nobu.nokada@... 2003/06/22

Hi,

[#1175] Re: [Patch] class.c code cleanup (rb_class_*_instance_methods) — Matthew Dempsky <jivera@...> 2003/06/22

On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 05:36, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1176] Re: [Patch] class.c code cleanup (rb_class_*_instance_methods) — nobu.nokada@... 2003/06/22

Hi,

[#1193] Re: [Patch] class.c code cleanup (rb_class_*_instance_methods) — Matthew Dempsky <jivera@...> 2003/06/25

On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 07:41, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#1177] Re: In 1.8.0 nil.to_s is not the same as "" — ts <decoux@...>

14 messages 2003/06/22

Re: [Patch] class.c code cleanup (rb_class_*_instance_methods)

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2003-06-22 10:36:17 UTC
List: ruby-core #1174
Hi,

At Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:32:58 +0900,
Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> This patch is just a simple refactoring of the
> rb_class_*_instance_methods to use a single common function body, rather
> than repeating it four separate times.  It introduces a new function,
> rb_class_generic_instance_methods, with the same signature as the others
> except taking an additional parameter of a function pointer.  (If you
> would like to accept this patch but want me to rename the
> function/parameter, I'd be willing to do so and resubmit.)

This will let all methods be warned as "instance_methods".

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread