[#101179] Spectre Mitigations — Amel <amel.smajic@...>
Hi there!
5 messages
2020/12/01
[#101180] Re: Spectre Mitigations
— Chris Seaton <chris@...>
2020/12/01
I wouldn’t recommend using Ruby to run in-process untrusted code in the first place. Are people doing that?
[#101694] Ruby 3.0.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 3.0.0. From 2015 we
4 messages
2020/12/25
[ruby-core:101840] [Ruby master Bug#17497] Ractor performance issue
From:
marcandre-ruby-core@...
Date:
2020-12-31 21:48:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #101840
Issue #17497 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune). ---------------------------------------- Bug #17497: Ractor performance issue https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17497 * Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada) * ruby -v: ruby 3.0.0p0 (2020-12-25 revision 95aff21468) [x86_64-darwin18] * Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- There's a strange performance issue with Ractor (at least on MacOS, didn't run on other OS). I ran a benchmark doing 3 different types of work: * "fib": method calls (naive fibonacci calculation) * "cpu": `(0...1000).inject(:+)` * "sleep": call `sleep` I get the kind of results I was excepting for the `fib` and for sleeping, but the results for the "cpu" workload show a problem. It is so slow that my pure Ruby backport (using Threads) is 65x faster on my Mac Pro (despite having 6 cores). Expected results would be 6x slower, so in that case Ractor is 400x slower than it should 仭 On my MacBook (2 cores) the results are not as bad, the `cpu` workload is 3x faster with my pure-Ruby backport (only) instead of ~2x slower, so the factor is 6x too slow. ``` $ gem install backports Successfully installed backports-3.20.0 1 gem installed $ ruby ractor_test.rb <internal:ractor>:267: warning: Ractor is experimental, and the behavior may change in future versions of Ruby! Also there are many implementation issues. fib: 110 ms | cpu: 22900 ms | sleep: 206 ms $ B=t ruby ractor_test.rb Using pure Ruby implementation fib: 652 ms | cpu: 337 ms | sleep: 209 ms ``` Notice the `sleep` run takes similar time, which is good, and `fib` is ~6x faster on my 6-core CPU (and ~2x faster on my 2-core MacBook), again that's good as the pure ruby version uses Threads and thus runs with a single GVL. The `cpu` version is the problem. Script is here: https://gist.github.com/marcandre/bfed626e538a3d0fc7cad38dc026cf0e -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>