[#37231] Announcing New Ruby Book Under Development! — <robert.calco@...>

Everybody:

31 messages 2002/04/02
[#37250] Re: [ANN] Announcing New Ruby Book Under Development! — "John" <jyeung@...> 2002/04/02

Have you checked out?

[#37279] About efficiency — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2002/04/02

[#37289] Re: About efficiency — nobu.nokada@... 2002/04/03

Hi,

[#37291] Re: About efficiency — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2002/04/03

On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 20:16, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#37232] seeking to understand... — Mark Probert <probertm@...>

38 messages 2002/04/02
[#37255] Re: Ruby, python, perl, ... — Chris <chris@...> 2002/04/02

In article <87d6xhaoif.fsf@jenny-gnome.dyndns.org>,

[#37281] Is eval a code/design smell? — "Chris Morris" <home@...>

I seem to have an inherent distaste for eval, but I don't know why. I've

51 messages 2002/04/03
[#37323] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...> 2002/04/03

On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:15:10 GMT, "Chris Morris" <home@clabs.org> wrote:

[#38034] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2002/04/11

On Wed 03 Apr 2002 at 20:35:30 +0900, you wrote:

[#38045] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2002/04/11

On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 01:40, Ian Macdonald wrote:

[#38061] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2002/04/11

On Thu 11 Apr 2002 at 22:07:03 +0900, you wrote:

[#38063] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2002/04/11

On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:06, Ian Macdonald wrote:

[#38064] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — ts <decoux@...> 2002/04/11

>>>>> "S" == Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com> writes:

[#38066] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2002/04/11

On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:25, ts wrote:

[#38067] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — ts <decoux@...> 2002/04/11

>>>>> "S" == Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com> writes:

[#38068] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2002/04/11

On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:42, ts wrote:

[#38069] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — ts <decoux@...> 2002/04/11

>>>>> "S" == Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com> writes:

[#38072] Re: Is eval a code/design smell? — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2002/04/11

On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:59, ts wrote:

[#37342] regular expression question — "Firestone, Mark - Technical Support" <mark.firestone@...>

Thanks for the help with the tread questions guys... I have one about (gasp)

16 messages 2002/04/03

[#37385] TextPad replacement for Linux? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

TIA,

25 messages 2002/04/03

[#37397] Really new-new-newbie question :) — "Philip Mateescu" <philip@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2002/04/03

[#37454] ModRUBY question — George Moschovitis <gmosx@...>

Hi everybody,

18 messages 2002/04/04

[#37470] Test the result of an initialization ? — jayce@... (Jayce Piel)

17 messages 2002/04/04

[#37540] Fibonacci Number Generators — jzakiya@... (Jabari Zakiya)

Hi, I'm a newbie, coming to Ruby from a

14 messages 2002/04/04

[#37549] OO/Ruby Terminology — <james@...>

I added a wiki page for Ruby book development ...

22 messages 2002/04/05
[#37808] Re: OO/Ruby Terminology — <bbense+comp.lang.ruby.Apr.07.02@...> 2002/04/10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#37861] RE: OO/Ruby Terminology — <james@...> 2002/04/10

> From: bbense+comp.lang.ruby.Apr.07.02@telemark.stanford.edu

[#37944] Re: OO/Ruby Terminology — Chris <chris@...> 2002/04/10

In article <PGEPJIFLPEPOHCKEEEIKIEFADCAA.james@rubyxml.com>,

[#37963] RE: OO/Ruby Terminology — <james@...> 2002/04/10

> From: Chris [mailto:chris@cmb-enterprises.com]

[#37617] Addition to file.c (File.extension) — Mike Hall <mghall@...>

18 messages 2002/04/05
[#37736] Re: Addition to file.c (File.extension) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/04/08

Hi,

[#37653] Switching from PHP to Ruby - Comments Please — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

34 messages 2002/04/06

[#37746] ruby-dev summary 16501-16750 — TAKAHASHI Masayoshi <maki@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2002/04/08

[#37833] Ruby as replacement for VB? — "Robb Shecter" <rs@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2002/04/10
[#37923] Re: Ruby as replacement for VB? — Michael Davis <mdavis@...> 2002/04/10

Robb Shecter wrote:

[#39153] Re: Ruby as replacement for VB? — "Euan Mee" <xlucid@...> 2002/04/26

On 11 Apr 2002, at 1:03, Michael Davis wrote:

[#37835] crypting ruby source — Ludo <coquelle@...>

Hi,

32 messages 2002/04/10
[#38280] Re: crypting ruby source — web2ed@... (Edward Wilson) 2002/04/14

Ludo <coquelle@enib.fr> wrote in message news:<3CB31298.13A44B26@enib.fr>...

[#38044] RFC - class_added callback — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hello,

16 messages 2002/04/11

[#38046] GetoptLong question — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)

Hi all,

16 messages 2002/04/11
[#38051] Re: GetoptLong question — "Pit Capitain" <pit@...> 2002/04/11

On 11 Apr 2002, at 22:16, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#38101] How to Make a Method Ineffective Efficiently? — William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2002/04/11
[#38135] Re: How to Make a Method Ineffective Efficiently? — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2002/04/12

Hello,

[#38159] Re: How to Make a Method Ineffective Efficiently? — William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...> 2002/04/12

Thanks for all the responses. I just want to add the final

[#38126] Ruby/Google — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2002/04/12

[#38136] Idea for a new shorthand — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, maybe this is an idea no one will like. Or

17 messages 2002/04/12

[#38167] Why Object#class Is Inconsistent in "==" and "case"? — William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2002/04/12

[#38199] not vs !, and vs && — <james@...>

I'm confused about the behavior of 'not'. The Pickaxe and Ruby21Days books

17 messages 2002/04/12

[#38238] Barnes & Noble putting on the squeeze — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

11 messages 2002/04/13

[#38239] Freshmeat article about Ruby — Tobias DiPasquale <anany@...>

Hi all,

28 messages 2002/04/13
[#38447] Re: Freshmeat article about Ruby — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2002/04/16

Tobias DiPasquale wrote:

[#38457] Re: Freshmeat article about Ruby — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/04/16

Hi --

[#38560] Re: Freshmeat article about Ruby — Mark Hulme Jones <mjones@...> 2002/04/18

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#38561] Re: Freshmeat article about Ruby — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2002/04/18

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:07:22AM +0900, Mark Hulme Jones wrote:

[#38562] Re: Freshmeat article about Ruby — Pat Eyler <pate@...> 2002/04/18

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Paul Brannan wrote:

[#38564] Re: Freshmeat article about Ruby — Jack Herrington <jack_d_herrington@...> 2002/04/18

On 4/18/02 9:30 AM, "Pat Eyler" <pate@eylerfamily.org> wrote:

[#38648] Ruby golf (FFT) Was: Freshmeat article about Ruby — Christian Szegedy <szegedy@...> 2002/04/19

Jack Herrington wrote:

[#38657] Re: Ruby golf (FFT) Was: Freshmeat article about Ruby — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/04/19

Hello --

[#38331] mime type — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi all,

15 messages 2002/04/15

[#38338] Compiling Ruby on Mac OS X — Alwyn <alwyn@...>

I've downloaded the latest Stable Snapshot and tried building it. It

18 messages 2002/04/15

[#38449] Help wanted for statvfs extension — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)

Hi all,

35 messages 2002/04/16
[#38470] Re: Help wanted for statvfs extension — "James F.Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2002/04/17

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 05:04:06 +0900

[#38525] resolv.rb Bug — "Roy J. Milican" <roy@...>

Greetings,

18 messages 2002/04/17

[#38627] Imlib2-Ruby 0.4.0 — Paul Duncan <pabs@...>

I just posted Imlib2-Ruby version 0.4.0, my Ruby bindings for Imlib2

12 messages 2002/04/19

[#38635] Threads creating threads creating threads... — Tobias Peters <tpeters@...>

I have already asked this question in [ruby-talk:19661], but I will ask it

12 messages 2002/04/19

[#38694] Ruby on .NET? — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

I scanned the .net threads here and didn't see whether there is, or is not, an

37 messages 2002/04/19
[#38696] RE: Ruby on .NET? — "repeater" <repeater@...> 2002/04/19

recently found:

[#38839] building extensions-- new vs initialize — "Norman Makoto Su" <normsu@...>

Hi, I'm trying to build a ruby extension in C. While looking at the pickaxe CD

14 messages 2002/04/23

[#38910] Numberic#prev — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

I do a lot of incrementing and decrementing of values: it'd be nice if

36 messages 2002/04/24

[#39047] A Wild Idea: What do you think? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

16 messages 2002/04/26

[#39122] RE: A Wild Idea: What do you think? — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

> > OK, then let's have it in Texas. How about August? Oh, what do you

28 messages 2002/04/26
[#39123] Re: A Wild Idea: What do you think? — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/04/26

On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:15:21AM +0900, Morris, Chris wrote:

[#39176] Re: A Wild Idea: What do you think? — Pat Eyler <pate@...> 2002/04/27

On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#39177] Re: A Wild Idea: What do you think? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/04/27

Hi --

[#39228] RubyConf.new(2002) - ideas for agenda — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>

Ok - so I'm probably jumping the gun here, but hey, what the heck.

27 messages 2002/04/28

[#39394] ncurses, mingw32 — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

i've been away from ruby for awhile, it was time to dust off the pickaxe book

13 messages 2002/04/30

Re: Ruby as Smalltalk

From: Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...>
Date: 2002-04-23 08:18:56 UTC
List: ruby-talk #38852
Hello,

At 15:56 23/04/2002 +0900, you wrote:
>By RCR#90, it would be:
>
>   exception_intercept({|| raise MyException},
>     {|exc|
>       case exc
>       when MyException
>         puts "Got the exception!"
>         kill_exception # don't let this exception propogate further
>       else
>        puts "UH OH!"
>       end
>     }
>   )
>
>But I'm still not sure it's good enough.
>
>                                                         matz.

Parenthesis are already not mandatory:
obj.meth {
   # first block
},{
   # second block
}

Is the "," really necessary or could "} {" be considered equivalent to "},{" ?

With do/end:
obj.meth do
   # first block
end do
   # second block
end

In a language I designed, in a method call, the name of the method could be 
expressed in multiple fragments:
   def PrintOn( msg, media)
   end
   o.PrintOn( "Classical", media)
   o.PrintOn "No parenthesis", media
   o.Print: "Smalltalk style" On: media  # 2 fragments here
Of course weird things were possible to:
   o.Pr: "Hello" intOn: "World"

At the end there were so many ways of forming the name of a method that is 
was becoming hard to figure out what was the method called. I then decided 
to mostly use the classical form and use the "Smalltalk" style in rare 
occasions where indentation make it clear about what was happening (i.e. 
human readable. it was always clear enough for the compiler). But the lf 
termination in Ruby will clash here.

This worked with "named values" (hash) too:
   o.Print: :Color => Red, Text: "Hello" On: media
   o.Print: (Color: Red, Text: "Hello") On: media # Parenthesis needed
   o.Print:
      (Color: Red, Text: "Hello")
     On: media

BTW: def printon end ; o.print: xx on: yy; for those that don't like CamelCase.

BTW: I also had a "with xx do xxx end" where any ".mm" inside the "with" 
would resolve into xx.mm. I think other languages have such a "with" 
statement. This is another story I guess

Yours,

Jean-Hugues


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Web:  http://hdl.handle.net/1030.37/1.1
Phone: +33 (0) 4 92 27 74 17

In This Thread