[#927] UnboundMethod#to_proc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm wondering what I can do with a Proc generated by
17 messages
2003/04/06
[#929] Re: UnboundMethod#to_proc
— "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>
2003/04/06
----- Original Message -----
[#934] Re: UnboundMethod#to_proc
— Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
2003/04/06
[#940] Re: UnboundMethod#to_proc
— chr_news@...
2003/04/07
>
[#941] Re: UnboundMethod#to_proc
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2003/04/07
>> If they have diverging interfaces such that the contracts conflict
[#936] docs on implementation of ruby and/or ruby-gc ? — Ruben Vandeginste <Ruben.Vandeginste@...>
4 messages
2003/04/07
[#964] Range in logical context — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
If I run
7 messages
2003/04/16
[#965] Re: Range in logical context
— Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
2003/04/16
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 06:10:40AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#973] problem with rb_rescue2() ? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
5 messages
2003/04/19
Re: 0 prefix in floats ?
From:
Chris Ross <chris@...>
Date:
2003-04-24 06:24:02 UTC
List:
ruby-core #986
I suspect it's to remove ambiguity so the .5 can't be confused by the programmer or interpreter as a method call on the previous object. [Although I could, and probably am, wrong]. Regards, Chris On Thursday, April 24, 2003, at 07:02 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > > .5 > #<SyntaxError: (eval):1: compile error > (eval):1: no .<digit> floating literal anymore; put 0 before dot > (eval):1: parse error> > /home/matju/bin/iruby:57 > > May I know what happened with floats written like ".5" ? why is that > syntax no longer supported ? > > ________________________________________________________________ > Mathieu Bouchard http://artengine.ca/matju > > > -- Chris Ross --> home: chris@darkrock.co.uk | http://www.darkrock.co.uk --> university: ctr@cs.bham.ac.uk | http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~ctr/ --> ferite programming language | http://www.ferite.org