Re: Bob Jenkins' hashing implementation in Ruby
From:
Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Date:
2003-03-01 19:20:38 UTC
List:
ruby-core #901
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:09:15AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote: > Hi, > > At Sun, 2 Mar 2003 03:55:37 +0900, > Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote: > > Why isn't that in use right now? > > You can argue that -funroll-loops does the same, but a lot of people are > > using the binary supplied by their vendor, compiled without "strange" > > options... > > Just it has not been considered necessary yet, I guess. If it's faster and simple enough, it's good, isn't it? Several small speed increments even by a couple % can add up to a real difference... -- _ _ | |__ __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __ | '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ | |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | | |_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_| Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable) batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com We apologize for the inconvenience, but we'd still like yout to test out this kernel. -- Linus Torvalds, announcing another kernel patch