[#88240] [Ruby trunk Feature#14759] [PATCH] set M_ARENA_MAX for glibc malloc — sam.saffron@...
Issue #14759 has been updated by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
[#88251] Re: [ruby-alerts:8236] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64134)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
[#88305] [Ruby trunk Bug#14968] [PATCH] io.c: make all pipes nonblocking by default — normalperson@...
Issue #14968 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
[#88331] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — samuel@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
[#88342] [Ruby trunk Feature#14955] [PATCH] gc.c: use MADV_FREE to release most of the heap page body — ko1@...
Issue #14955 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88433] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — ko1@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
[#88475] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — ko1@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88491] Re: [ruby-cvs:71466] k0kubun:r64374 (trunk): test_function.rb: skip running test — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
k0kubun@ruby-lang.org wrote:
I see. Please remove the test if the test is unnecessary.
Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@gmail.com> wrote:
[#88523] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
eregontp@gmail.com wrote:
[#88549] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
[#88676] [Ruby trunk Misc#15014] thread.c: use rb_hrtime_scalar for high-resolution time operations — ko1@...
Issue #15014 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2018/08/27 16:16, Eric Wong wrote:
[#88716] Re: [ruby-dev:43715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #595] Fiber ignores ensure clause — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Koichi Sasada wrote:
[#88723] [Ruby trunk Bug#15041] [PATCH] cont.c: set th->root_fiber to current fiber at fork — ko1@...
Issue #15041 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88767] [Ruby trunk Bug#15050] GC after forking with fibers crashes — ko1@...
Issue #15050 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#88774] Re: [ruby-alerts:8955] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64594)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
[ruby-core:88408] [Ruby trunk Feature#14975] String#append without changing receiver's encoding
Issue #14975 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). That makes total sense, so it seems like we are in agreement, when the receiver is BINARY, we can append anything to it without changing the encoding. What do you think? I can make PR. ---------------------------------------- Feature #14975: String#append without changing receiver's encoding https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14975#change-73460 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I'm not sure where this fits in, but in order to avoid garbage and superfluous function calls, is it possible that `String#<<`, `String#concat` or the (proposed) `String#append` can avoid changing the encoding of the receiver? Right now it's very tricky to do this in a way that doesn't require extra allocations. Here is what I do: ```ruby class Buffer < String BINARY = Encoding::BINARY def initialize super force_encoding(BINARY) end def << string if string.encoding == BINARY super(string) else super(string.b) # Requires extra allocation. end return self end alias concat << end ``` When the receiver is binary, but contains byte sequences, appending UTF_8 can fail: ``` "Foobar".b << "F淡淡bar" => "FoobarF淡淡bar" > "F淡淡bar".b << "F淡淡bar" Encoding::CompatibilityError: incompatible character encodings: ASCII-8BIT and UTF-8 ``` So, it's not possible to append data, generally, and then call `force_encoding(Encoding::BINARY)`. One must ensure the string is binary before appending it. It would be nice if there was a solution which didn't require additional allocations/copies/linear scans for what should basically be a `memcpy`. See also: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14033 and https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13626#note-3 There are two options to fix this: 1/ Don't change receiver encoding in any case. 2/ Apply 1, but only when receiver is using `Encoding::BINARY` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>