[#75687] [Ruby trunk Bug#12416] struct rb_id_table lacks mark function — shyouhei@...
Issue #12416 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
3 messages
2016/05/23
[#75763] [Ruby trunk Feature#12435] Using connect_nonblock to open TCP connections in Net::HTTP#connect — mohamed.m.m.hafez@...
Issue #12435 has been reported by Mohamed Hafez.
3 messages
2016/05/28
[#75774] Errno::EAGAIN thrown by OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock — Mohamed Hafez <mohamed.m.m.hafez@...>
Hi all, every now and then in my production server, I'm
4 messages
2016/05/30
[#75775] Re: Errno::EAGAIN thrown by OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock
— Mohamed Hafez <mohamed.m.m.hafez@...>
2016/05/30
Or does MRI's OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock just return
[#75782] Important: Somewhat backwards-incompatible change (Fwd: [ruby-cvs:62388] duerst:r55225 (trunk): * string.c: Activate full Unicode case mapping for UTF-8) — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
With the change below, I have activated full Unicode case mapping for
4 messages
2016/05/31
[ruby-core:75362] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12005] Unify Fixnum and Bignum into Integer
From:
Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
Date:
2016-05-05 02:50:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75362
On 2016/05/04 23:54, akr@fsij.org wrote: > I feel that unifying Fixnum and Bignum is simple and beautiful. > > However I'm not sure that there are enough concrete benefits over > the incompatibility. > Concrete benefits I know is that less code for mathn.rb like library. > It needs to modify only one class, Integer, instead of two, Fixnum and Bignum. > > Other benefits? > > Are they enough to justify the incompatibility? > I hope enough benefits to justify this issue. I think there are some serious benefits in documentation and for learning Ruby. But these are not so concrete, and more long term. Regards, Martin. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>